Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 23, 2025

Brain Morphology of Cannabis Users With or Without Psychosis: A Pilot MRI Study
Published on: August 18, 2020
Chronic Procrastination Among Iranians: Prevalence Estimation, Latent Profile and Network Analyses
Mehdi Akbari1, Mohammad Seydavi2, Kianoush Zahrakar3
1Department of Clinical Psychology, Faculty of Psychology and Education, Kharazmi University, No.43. South Mofatteh Ave, Tehran, Iran. m.akbari@khu.ac.ir.
Procrastination affects 15.4% of the Iranian population, particularly women. Psychological distress, neuroticism, and extraversion characterize procrastinators, while self-efficacy and conscientiousness define non-procrastinators.
Area of Science:
- Psychology
- Behavioral Science
Background:
- Procrastination is defined as the intentional delay of actions despite negative consequences.
- Understanding the prevalence and psychological correlates of procrastination is crucial for developing effective interventions.
Purpose of the Study:
- To determine the prevalence of procrastination in the Iranian adult population.
- To identify demographic and psychological factors associated with procrastination.
- To explore the network structure of procrastination and its related variables.
Main Methods:
- A large-scale online survey (N=2,076) was conducted with a diverse adult population.
- Latent profile analysis and network analysis were employed to identify distinct profiles and relationships between variables.
- Data included self-reported measures of procrastination, psychological distress, personality traits, and self-efficacy.
Main Results:
- The prevalence of procrastination was 15.4%, with higher rates among women and divorced individuals, and lower rates among nomadic individuals and those with higher education.
- Two distinct profiles emerged: procrastinators (high in distress, neuroticism, extraversion; low in self-efficacy, self-esteem, life satisfaction, conscientiousness) and non-procrastinators.
- Network analysis indicated that key study variables were peripheral, not central, in the procrastination network, suggesting a complex interplay of factors.
Conclusions:
- Procrastination exhibits demographic variations and is linked to a specific psychological profile.
- The network structure suggests that no single variable is a primary vulnerability for procrastination.
- Relying solely on mean score differences may not be optimal for therapeutic interventions; a network-based approach may be more informative.
More Related Videos
Related Concept Videos
Longitudinal Research
Self-Discrepancy Theory
Surveys
Psychological and Sociocultural Causes of Schizophrenia
Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder
Diagnostic Criteria and Symptoms
To diagnose ADHD, symptoms must manifest before age 12 and be evident across multiple settings....
Stress Prevention and Stress Management Techniques II
Type A Personality: Driven and Easily Stressed
Individuals with Type A personalities are often highly competitive and ambitious and operate with a strong sense of urgency. Commonly labeled as...

