Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 23, 2025
Hemocompatibility Testing of Blood-Contacting Implants in a Flow Loop Model Mimicking Human Blood Flow
Published on: March 5, 2020
Every minute counts: A comparison of thawing times and haemostatic quality of plasma thawed at 37°C and 45°C using
J McCullagh1,2,3, C Booth1,2, J Lancut4
1Clinical Haematology, Barts Health NHS Trust, London, UK.
Background:
Having faster plasma thawing devices could be beneficial for transfusion services, as it may improve the rapid availability of thawed plasma for bleeding patients, and it might remove the need to have extended pre-thawed plasma: thus, reducing unnecessary plasma wastage.
Study Design And Methods:
The aims of this study were to assess (a) the thawing times and (b) in vitro haemostatic quality of thawed plasma using Barkey Plasmatherm V (PTV) at 37 and 45°C versus Barkey Plasmatherm Classic (PTC) at 37 and 45°C, Sarstedt Sahara-III Maxitherm (SS-III) at 37°C and Helmer Scientific Thermogenesis Thermoline (TT) at 37°C. Haemostatic quality was assessed using LG-Octaplas at three different time points: baseline (5 min), 24 and 120 h after thawing.
Results:
The thawing time (SD) of 2 and 4 units was significantly different between different thawers. PTV at 45°C was the fastest method for both 2 and 4 units (7.06 min [0.68], 9.6 min [0.87], respectively). SS-III at 37°C being the slowest method (24.69 min [2.09] and 27.18 min [4.4], respectively) (p = < 0.05). Baseline measurements for all assays showed no significant difference in the prothrombin time, fibrinogen, FII, FV, protein C activity or free protein S antigen between all methods tested. However, at baseline PTV (both 37°C and 45°C) had significantly higher levels of FVII, FVIII and FXI and shortened activated partial thromboplastin time.
Discussion:
PTV was the quickest method at thawing plasma at both 37 and at 45°C. The haemostatic quality of plasma thawed at 45 versus 37°C was not impaired. Thawing frozen plasma at 45°C should be considered.
