Do High Doses of Multiple Antibiotics Loaded into Bone Cement Spacers Improve the Success Rate in Staphylococcal

Lourdes Prats-Peinado1, Tanya Fernández-Fernández1, Miguel Márquez-Gómez1

  • 1Department of Orthopedic Surgery, General University Hospital Gregorio Marañón, 28007 Madrid, Spain.

Insights

This study shows that a two-stage revision surgery using antibiotic-loaded bone cement spacers effectively treats staphylococcal prosthetic joint infections (PJI). Rifampicin use did not impact treatment success rates, offering a safe alternative for patients unable to take this drug.

Area of Science:

  • Orthopedic Surgery
  • Infectious Diseases
  • Pharmacology

Background:

  • Staphylococcal prosthetic joint infection (PJI) is a growing concern, often requiring complex revision surgery.
  • Rifampicin, a common treatment, has limitations due to intolerance and drug interactions.
  • Two-stage revision surgery is the standard, but optimizing antibiotic delivery is crucial.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To evaluate the efficacy and safety of a novel two-stage revision protocol for staphylococcal PJI.
  • To assess outcomes in patients ineligible for rifampicin treatment.
  • To analyze the impact of high-dose, multi-antibiotic bone cement spacers.

Main Methods:

  • Retrospective review of 43 staphylococcal hip and knee PJI cases (2012-2020).
  • Manual casting of bone cement spacers with high doses of gentamicin, clindamycin, vancomycin, and ceftazidime.
  • Comparison of outcomes between patients treated with and without systemic rifampicin.

Main Results:

  • An overall infection eradication rate of 82% was achieved.
  • No significant difference in eradication rates between patients with (84%) and without (79%) rifampicin.
  • Low rates of positive cultures (7%), spacer replacement (18%), and no systemic toxicity observed.

Conclusions:

  • Two-stage revision with high-dose local antibiotics (ceftazidime, vancomycin, gentamicin, clindamycin) is highly effective for staphylococcal PJI.
  • Systemic rifampicin is not essential for successful outcomes in this protocol.
  • This multi-antibiotic spacer approach provides a safe and viable alternative for patients intolerant to rifampicin.