Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 22, 2025

A Novel Digital Platform for a Monitored Home-based Cardiac Rehabilitation Program
Published on: April 19, 2019
The Effect of an mHealth Self-Monitoring Intervention (MI-BP) on Blood Pressure Among Black Individuals With
Lorraine R Buis1, Junhan Kim2, Ananda Sen1,3
1Department of Family Medicine, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, United States.
Insights
A mobile health intervention for hypertension showed no significant difference compared to usual care, highlighting the benefits of proactive engagement for Black adults with uncontrolled hypertension. High dropout rates were observed in both groups.
Area of Science:
- Cardiovascular Disease Research
- Health Disparities
- Mobile Health Interventions
Background:
- Hypertension affects over 100 million American adults, posing significant cardiovascular disease risk.
- Black communities experience substantial hypertension-related health inequities, including lower BP control and adverse cardiovascular events.
- The MI-BP mobile health intervention was developed to address these disparities in Black individuals with uncontrolled hypertension.
Purpose of the Study:
- To determine the 1-year effect of the MI-BP intervention on blood pressure (BP) and secondary outcomes.
- To compare the MI-BP intervention against enhanced usual care for physical activity, sodium intake, medication adherence, and BP control.
Main Methods:
- A 1-year randomized controlled trial comparing the MI-BP intervention to enhanced usual care.
- Participants (25-70 years) with uncontrolled hypertension were recruited from EDs and community settings in Detroit, Michigan.
- Outcomes included BP (primary), physical activity, sodium intake, medication adherence, and BP control, with data collected at multiple time points.
Main Results:
- Both groups showed significant systolic BP decreases at 1 year, with no significant difference between the MI-BP and control groups.
- Similar improvements were observed in diastolic BP, physical activity, sodium intake, medication adherence, and BP control, with no between-group differences.
- High dropout rates (approximately 60%) were observed in both the intervention and control groups.
Conclusions:
- Both MI-BP and enhanced usual care led to significant improvements in BP and other cardiometabolic risk factors.
- No significant differences were detected between the MI-BP intervention and enhanced usual care, suggesting benefits of proactive engagement.
- High dropout rates necessitate further research into mobile health intervention engagement in urban, low-socioeconomic-status Black populations.
Background:
Hypertension is one of the most important cardiovascular disease risk factors and affects >100 million American adults. Hypertension-related health inequities are abundant in Black communities as Black individuals are more likely to use the emergency department (ED) for chronic disease-related ambulatory care, which is strongly linked to lower blood pressure (BP) control, diminished awareness of hypertension, and adverse cardiovascular events. To reduce hypertension-related health disparities, we developed MI-BP, a culturally tailored multibehavior mobile health intervention that targeted behaviors of BP self-monitoring, physical activity, sodium intake, and medication adherence in Black individuals with uncontrolled hypertension recruited from ED and community-based settings.
Objective:
We sought to determine the effect of MI-BP on BP as well as secondary outcomes of physical activity, sodium intake, medication adherence, and BP control compared to enhanced usual care control at 1-year follow-up.
Methods:
We conducted a 1-year, 2-group randomized controlled trial of the MI-BP intervention compared to an enhanced usual care control group where participants aged 25 to 70 years received a BP cuff and hypertension-related educational materials. Participants were recruited from EDs and other community-based settings in Detroit, Michigan, where they were screened for initial eligibility and enrolled. Baseline data collection and randomization occurred approximately 2 and 4 weeks after enrollment to ensure that participants had uncontrolled hypertension and were willing to take part. Data collection visits occurred at 13, 26, 39, and 52 weeks. Outcomes of interest included BP (primary outcome) and physical activity, sodium intake, medication adherence, and BP control (secondary outcomes).
Results:
We obtained consent from and enrolled 869 participants in this study yet ultimately randomized 162 (18.6%) participants. At 1 year, compared to the baseline, both groups showed significant decreases in systolic BP (MI-BP group: 22.5 mm Hg decrease in average systolic BP and P<.001; control group: 24.1 mm Hg decrease and P<.001) adjusted for age and sex, with no significant differences between the groups (time-by-arm interaction: P=.99). Similar patterns where improvements were noted in both groups yet no differences were found between the groups were observed for diastolic BP, physical activity, sodium intake, medication adherence, and BP control. Large dropout rates were observed in both groups (approximately 60%).
Conclusions:
Overall, participants randomized to both the enhanced usual care control and MI-BP conditions experienced significant improvements in BP and other outcomes; however, differences between groups were not detected, speaking to the general benefit of proactive outreach and engagement focused on cardiometabolic risk reduction in urban-dwelling, low-socioeconomic-status Black populations. High dropout rates were found and are likely to be expected when working with similar populations. Future work is needed to better understand engagement with mobile health interventions, particularly in this population.
Trial Registration:
ClinicalTrials.gov NCT02955537; https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT02955537.
International Registered Report Identifier (Irrid):
RR2-10.2196/12601.
Related Concept Videos
Errors occurring during blood pressure monitoring
Several factors...
Factors affecting Blood pressure
Physiological Factors:
Pre-Procedural Guidelines for Assessing Blood Pressure
Special considerations while measuring blood pressure
Monitoring Both Arms:
Monitoring BP in both arms during the initial assessment is advisable, as the systolic value may differ by five to ten mm Hg between arms. For subsequent BP assessments, use the arm with the higher reading.
Hypertension and Regulation of Blood Pressure
Blood Pressure
The average BP in an adult is typically around 120/80 mmHg (millimeters of mercury). In this measurement, the numerator (120) indicates the systolic pressure, which is the pressure in the arteries during the contraction of the heart's ventricles as blood is expelled. The denominator (80) represents the...

