Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 22, 2025

Introduction of Intracapsular Rotary-cut Procedures IRCP: A Modified Hysteromyomectomy Procedures Facilitating Fertility Preservation
Published on: January 17, 2019
Risk of Bowel Obstruction After Hysterectomy for Benign Indication According to Surgical Method in Denmark, 1984-2013
Christina Norrbom1, Merete Osler2, Marie Krabbe-Sørensen3
1Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, North Zealand Hospital Hillerød, Hillerød, Denmark (Dr. Norrbom, Mr. Rasmussen, Mr. Carlsen, Dr. Settnes, and Dr. Løkkegaard); Department of Clinical Medicine (Drs. Norrbom, Nilas, Settnes, and Løkkegaard) and Section of Epidemiology.
Study Objective:
To estimate the risk of bowel obstruction (BO) after hysterectomy for benign indications depending on the surgical method (abdominal, vaginal, or laparoscopic) and identify risk factors for adhesive BO.
Design:
A national registry-based cohort.
Setting:
Danish hospitals during the period 1984-2013.
Patients:
Danish women who underwent hysterectomy for benign indications (N = 125 568).
Interventions:
Abdominal hysterectomies were compared with vaginal hysterectomies, laparoscopic hysterectomies, and minimally invasive (vaginal and laparoscopic) hysterectomies.
Measurements And Main Results:
The incidence of BO according to the surgical method was compared using Cox proportional hazard regression. The covariates included were the time period, age, concomitant operations, previous abdominal surgery or disease, and socioeconomic factors. In a subanalysis (n = 35 712 women) of the period 2004-2013, detailed information from the Danish Hysterectomy Database enabled the inclusion of patient-, surgery-, and complication-related covariates. The overall crude incidence of BO was 17.4 of 1000 hysterectomies (2196 incident cases). The 10-year cumulative incidence of BO differed among the surgical routes (abdominal, 1.7%; laparoscopic, 1.4%; and vaginal, 0.9%). In multiple-adjusted analyses, the risk of BO was higher after abdominal hysterectomy than after vaginal (hazard ratio 1.64 [95% confidence interval, 1.39-1.93]) and minimally invasive (vaginal or laparoscopic) hysterectomy (hazard ratio 1.54 [1.33-1.79]). Additional pre-existing risk factors for BO at the time of hysterectomy were increased age, low education, low income, smoking, high American Society of Anesthesiologists comorbidity score, history of infertility, abdominal infection, and previous abdominal surgery (apart from cesarean section), penetrating lesions in abdominal organs, or operative adhesiolysis. Perioperative risk factors at the time of hysterectomy included concomitant removal of the ovaries, adhesiolysis, blood transfusion, readmission, and overall presence of perioperative complications.
Conclusion:
Abdominal hysterectomy is associated with a 54% higher risk of BO than minimally invasive (laparoscopic or vaginal) hysterectomy.
Related Concept Videos
Endoscopic Procedures IV: Sigmoidoscopy and Laproscopy
Sigmoidoscopy
Sigmoidoscopy is a diagnostic procedure that uses a flexible sigmoidoscope equipped with a light source and camera to examine the rectum and sigmoid colon. The procedure involves inserting the tube through the anus...
Inflammatory Bowel Disease V: Surgical Management
Here are some common surgical interventions for IBD:

