The Prognostic Significance of Tumor SUVmax Value in Pre- and Post-Chemoradiotherapy 18F-FDG PET/CT Imaging in Patients with Localized and Advanced Head and Neck Squamous Cell Carcinoma
Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 22, 2025

Gene Regulation and Targeted Therapy in Gastric Cancer Peritoneal Metastasis: Radiological Findings from Dual Energy CT and PET/CT
Published on: January 22, 2018
O Kandemir1, F Demir2, G G Avcı3
1Department of Nuclear Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Sıtkı Kocman University, Mugla, Turkey.
Background:
Some parameters of 18F-2-fluoro-2-deoxy-D-glucose positron emission tomography/computed tomography (18F-FDG PET/CT) can predict tumor chemosensitivity and survival in patients with head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC).
Aim:
The aim of the study was to investigate the prognostic value of pre- and post-treatment maximum standardized uptake values (SUVmax) in 18F-FDG PET/CT imaging for predicting mortality in patients with HNSCC, as well as its prognostic value in terms of disease progression, overall survival (OS), and progression-free survival (PFS).
Methods:
This retrospective study included 37 patients with a histopathological diagnosis of HNSCCs between 2015 and 2018. In patients with HNSCC, the first 18F-FDG PET/CT imaging was performed for pre-treatment staging, and the second imaging was performed to evaluate post-treatment response. In these imaging studies, SUVmax values of the primary tumor before and after treatment were determined. After the second imaging, patients were re-evaluated and followed up. ROC analysis was used to determine the predictive value of 18F-FDG PET/CT SUVmax parameters in terms of death and progression, and Cox regression analysis was used to investigate the prognostic value in terms of OS and PFS.
Results:
Cut-off value 15 for SUVmax1 (pre-treatment) had a significant predictive value for mortality (P = 0.02). Cut-off value 3.1 for SUVmax2 (post-treatment) had a significant predictive value for progression (P = 0.024). In univariate analysis, both SUVmax1 and SUVmax2 values were significant prognostic factors for OS (P = 0.047, P = 0.004). However, for PFS, only the SUVmax2 value was a significant prognostic factor (P = 0.001).
Conclusion:
SUVmax1 value of the primary tumor at diagnosis in HNSCC patients has a predictive value for mortality and a prognostic value for OS. However, the SUVmax2 value in the primary tumor after treatment is a predictive factor for progression and a prognostic factor for both OS and PFS.
![Semi-quantitative Assessment Using [18F]FDG Tracer in Patients with Severe Brain Injury](/_next/image?url=https%3A%2F%2Fcloudfront.jove.com%2FCDNSource%2Fteasers%2F58641.jpg&w=3840&q=50)
![Quantitative [18F]-Naf-PET-MRI Analysis for the Evaluation of Dynamic Bone Turnover in a Patient with Facetogenic Low Back Pain](/_next/image?url=https%3A%2F%2Fcloudfront.jove.com%2FCDNSource%2Fteasers%2F58491.jpg&w=3840&q=50)