Comparative Analysis of Protein Quantification by the SomaScan Assay versus Orthogonal Methods in Urine from People...

To our knowledge, calibration curves or other validations for thousands of SomaScan aptamers are not publicly available. Moreover, the abundance of urine proteins obtained from these assays is not routinely validated with orthogonal methods (OMs). We report an in-depth comparison of SomaScan readout for 23 proteins in urine samples from patients with diabetic kidney disease (n = 118) vs OMs, including liquid chromatography-targeted mass spectrometry (LC-MS), ELISA, and nephelometry. Pearson correlation between urine abundance of the 23 proteins from SomaScan 3.2 vs OMs ranged from -0.58 to 0.86, with a median (interquartile ratio, [IQR]) of 0.49 (0.18, 0.53). In multivariable linear regression, the SomaScan readout for 6 of the 23 examined proteins (26%) was most strongly associated with the OM-derived abundance of the same (target) protein. For 3 of 23 (13%), the SomaScan and OM-derived abundance of each protein were significantly associated, but the SomaScan readout was more strongly associated with OM-derived abundance of one or more "off-target" proteins. For the remaining 14 proteins (61%), the SomaScan readouts were not significantly associated with the OM-derived abundance of the targeted proteins. In 6 of the latest group, the SomaScan readout was not associated with urine abundance of any of the 23 quantified proteins. To sum, over half of the SomaScan results could not be confirmed by independent orthogonal methods.