Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 22, 2025

Multiplexed Isothermal Amplification Based Diagnostic Platform to Detect Zika, Chikungunya, and Dengue 1
Published on: March 13, 2018
Multiplex detection and identification of viral, bacterial, and protozoan pathogens in human blood and plasma using
Moussa Kourout1, Scott Espich1, Carolyn Fisher1
1Division of Emerging and Transfusion Transmitted Diseases, Office of Blood Research and Review, Center for Biologics Evaluation and Research, Food and Drug Administration, Silver Spring, MD, United States.
Abstract:
Introduction: Nucleic acid tests for blood donor screening have improved the safety of the blood supply; however, increasing numbers of emerging pathogen tests are burdensome. Multiplex testing platforms are a potential solution. Methods: The Blood Borne Pathogen Resequencing Microarray Expanded (BBP-RMAv.2) can perform multiplex detection and identification of 80 viruses, bacteria and parasites. This study evaluated pathogen detection in human blood or plasma. Samples spiked with selected pathogens, each with one of 6 viruses, 2 bacteria and 5 protozoans were tested on this platform. The nucleic acids were extracted, amplified using multiplexed sets of primers, and hybridized to a microarray. The reported sequences were aligned to a database to identify the pathogen. To directly compare the microarray to an emerging molecular approach, the amplified nucleic acids were also submitted to nanopore next generation sequencing (NGS). Results: The BBP-RMAv.2 detected viral pathogens at a concentration as low as 100 copies/ml and a range of concentrations from 1,000 to 100,000 copies/ml for all the spiked pathogens. Coded specimens were identified correctly demonstrating the effectiveness of the platform. The nanopore sequencing correctly identified most samples and the results of the two platforms were compared. Discussion: These results indicated that the BBP-RMAv.2 could be employed for multiplex detection with potential for use in blood safety or disease diagnosis. The NGS was nearly as effective at identifying pathogens in blood and performed better than BBP-RMAv.2 at identifying pathogen-negative samples.
More Related Videos
13:45Using a Pan-Viral Microarray Assay Virochip to Screen Clinical Samples for Viral Pathogens
Published on: April 27, 2011
11:09Multiplex Detection of Bacteria in Complex Clinical and Environmental Samples using Oligonucleotide-coupled Fluorescent Microspheres
Published on: October 23, 2011