Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 22, 2025

Silencing the Spark: CRISPR/Cas9 Genome Editing in Weakly Electric Fish
Published on: October 27, 2019
Single generation epigenetic change in captivity and reinforcement in subsequent generations in a delta smelt
Ensieh Habibi1, Michael R Miller1, Andrea Schreier1
1Department of Animal Science, University of California Davis, Davis, California, USA.
Abstract:
A refugial population of the endangered delta smelt (Hypomesus transpacificus) has been maintained at the Fish Conservation and Culture Laboratory (FCCL) at UC Davis since 2008. Despite intense genetic management, fitness differences between wild and cultured fish have been observed at the FCCL. To investigate the molecular underpinnings of hatchery domestication, we used whole-genome bisulfite sequencing to quantify epigenetic differences between wild and hatchery-origin delta smelt. Differentially methylated regions (DMRs) were identified from 104 individuals by comparing the methylation patterns in different generations of hatchery fish (G1, G2, G3) with their wild parents (G0). We discovered a total of 132 significant DMRs (p < .05) between G0 and G1, 132 significant DMRs between G0 and G2, and 201 significant DMRs between G0 and G3. Our results demonstrate substantial differences in methylation patterns emerged between the wild and hatchery-reared fish in the early generations in the hatchery, with a higher proportion of hypermethylated DMRs in hatchery-reared fish. The rearing environment was found to be a stronger predictor of individual clustering based on methylation patterns than family, sex or generation. Our study indicates a reinforcement of the epigenetic status with successive generations in the hatchery environment, as evidenced by an increase in methylation in hypermethylated DMRs and a decrease in methylation in hypomethylated DMRs over time. Lastly, our results demonstrated heterogeneity in inherited methylation pattern in families across generations. These insights highlight the long-term consequences of hatchery practices on the epigenetic landscape, potentially impacting wild fish populations.
Related Concept Videos
Background and Environment Affect Phenotype
An example of how genetic background affects phenotype can be seen in horses. The Extension gene in horses is responsible for their coat color. A wild-type gene (EE) produces black pigment in the coat, while a mutant gene (ee) produces red pigment. A...
Speciation Rates
Testing a Claim about Mean: Known Population SD
Estimating a population mean requires the samples to be distributed normally. The data should be collected from the randomly selected samples having no sampling bias. The sample size needed to be higher than 30, and most importantly, the population standard deviation should be already known.
In most realistic situations, the population standard deviation is often unknown, but in rare circumstances, when it...
Hybrid Zones
Fixed Action Patterns

