Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 22, 2025
Identification of OTX1 and OTX2 As Two Possible Molecular Markers for Sinonasal Carcinomas and Olfactory Neuroblastomas
Published on: February 28, 2019
Outcomes of SWI/SNF complex-deficient sinonasal carcinomas in a Southeast Asian cohort
Xinni Xu1, Bingcheng Wu2, Kwok Seng Loh1,3
1Department of Otolaryngology - Head & Neck Surgery, National University Hospital, Singapore, Singapore.
Background:
SWI/SNF complex-deficient sinonasal carcinomas are rare, genetically distinct, and aggressive entities.
Methods:
SMARCB1 and SMARCA4 immunohistochemistry was retrospectively performed on a cohort of undifferentiated, poorly differentiated, and poorly defined sinonasal carcinomas. Survival outcomes were compared between SMARCB1/SMARCA4 (SWI/SNF complex)-deficient and -retained groups.
Results:
Eight SWI/SNF complex-deficient (six SMARCB1-deficient, two SMARCA4-deficient) cases were identified among 47 patients over 12 years. Triple-modality treatment was more frequently utilized in SWI/SNF complex-deficient carcinomas than in SWI/SNF complex-retained carcinomas (71.4% vs. 11.8%, p = 0.001). After a median follow-up of 21.3 (IQR 9.9-56.0) months, SWI/SNF complex-deficient sinonasal carcinomas showed comparable recurrence rates (57.1% vs. 52.9%, p = 0.839), time-to-recurrence (7.3 [IQR 6.6-8.3] vs. 9.1 [IQR 3.9-17.4] months, p = 0.531), and overall survival (17.7 [IQR 11.8-67.0] vs. 21.6 [IQR 8.9-56.0] months, p = 0.835) compared to SWI/SNF complex-retained sinonasal carcinomas.
Conclusion:
Triple-modality treatment may improve survival in SWI/SNF complex-deficient sinonasal carcinomas.
More Related Videos
07:29Intramucosal Inoculation of Squamous Cell Carcinoma Cells in Mice for Tumor Immune Profiling and Treatment Response Assessment
Published on: April 22, 2019
07:52In Vivo CRISPR/Cas9 Screening to Simultaneously Evaluate Gene Function in Mouse Skin and Oral Cavity
Published on: November 2, 2020
