Related Experiment Video
Updated: Apr 28, 2026

Vessel-sparing Excision and Primary Anastomosis
Published on: January 7, 2019
Investigation of Disparity of Urologic Fellowship Match Rates by Gender and US Versus International Medical Graduates
Kamil Malshy1, Sari Khaleel1, Keith Rourke2
1The Minimally Invasive Urology Institute, The Miriam Hospital, Warren Alpert Medical School of Brown University, Providence, RI.
Objective:
To investigate the influence of postgraduate medical education (US vs international) and gender on applicant matching for postgraduate training across different urologic sub-specialties.
Methods:
Match statistics of 5 societies that participated in the AUA fellowship match between 2010 and 2024 were retrospectively reviewed. Societies included: Endourology Society (EUS), Society for Urological Oncology (SUO), American Society of Andrology (ASA), Society of Genitourinary Reconstructive Surgeons (GURS), and Society of Pediatric Urology (SPU). Candidates were classified based on gender (male/female) and their postgraduate medical education: local graduates from the United States or Canada (US/Ca) and international medical graduates (IMGs). The match odds were analyzed using the Chi-square test, while trends were assessed through the Mann-Kendall test.
Results:
Overall, 2439 applicants applied for 1627 programs from 2010 to 2024, comprising 1998 males (81.8%), 399 females (16.4%), and 42 undisclosed (1.7%). There were 1486 US/Ca graduates (60.8%) and 953 IMGs (39.2%). Around 1471 (60.6%) applicants were matched with a program, compared to 958 (39.4%) unmatched. The likelihood of US/Ca graduates matching (83.8%) was significantly higher than IMGs (23.3%), OR= 17.5, 95% CI: (14.3, 21.5), P <.001. IMGs had the highest match rate with GURS (33.8%, 47/118) and the lowest with SPU (7%, 1/14). Female applicants had a significantly higher chance of matching 324/399 (81.2%) than male applicants 1139/1998 (57%), OR= 3.26, 95% CI: (2.5, 4.3), P <.001. US/Ca-to-IMGs ratios and the male-to-female ratios were stable throughout the match years.
Conclusion:
Compared to IMGs, U.S./Ca graduates had remarkably higher matching rates. Matching outcomes were also significantly better for female applicants. Further assessment of international involvement and diversity in urological subspecialty roles is warranted.
More Related Videos
05:46Introduction of Intracapsular Rotary-cut Procedures IRCP: A Modified Hysteromyomectomy Procedures Facilitating Fertility Preservation
Published on: January 17, 2019
05:04Author Spotlight: Evaluating Clinicians' Adoption of Ultrasound-Guided Vascular Cannulation Through Simulation Training
Published on: August 9, 2024
Related Concept Videos
Wilcoxon Rank-Sum Test
Disorders of the Male Reproductive System
Prostate disorders are another major concern. These conditions can impair urinary flow due to the prostate's location around the urethra....
Microbiota of the Urogenital Tract