Contralateral differences in ankle SBP and pulse wave velocity: associations with incident heart failure and

Daniela Charry1, Jing Xu2, Michelle L Meyer3

  • 1Department of Kinesiology and Health Education, The University of Texas at Austin, Austin, Texas.

PubMed

Insights

Contralateral differences in ankle blood pressure and pulse wave velocity are linked to higher mortality risk in older adults. These measurements can serve as important indicators for cardiovascular health assessment.

Area of Science:

  • Cardiovascular Medicine
  • Gerontology
  • Vascular Biology

Background:

  • Contralateral differences in brachial systolic blood pressure (SBP) suggest underlying cardiovascular issues.
  • Assessing vascular health through peripheral measurements is crucial for predicting adverse outcomes.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate the association between contralateral differences in ankle SBP, brachial-ankle pulse wave velocity (baPWV), and heart-ankle pulse wave velocity (haPWV) and the risk of heart failure and mortality.
  • To determine the predictive value of these vascular parameters in an aging population.

Main Methods:

  • Utilized Cox proportional-hazards models to analyze data from 5077 participants in the Atherosclerosis Risk in Communities study (mean age 75 years).
  • Assessed outcomes including incident heart failure, all-cause mortality, and cardiovascular mortality over a mean follow-up of 7.5 years.

Main Results:

  • Significant associations were found between contralateral differences in ankle SBP (≥15 mmHg), baPWV (>240 cm/s), and haPWV (>80 cm/s) and increased all-cause mortality.
  • Contralateral ankle SBP differences (≥15 mmHg) and haPWV (>80 cm/s) were independently linked to higher cardiovascular mortality.
  • Unadjusted analyses indicated that these differences were also associated with a higher risk of heart failure.

Conclusions:

  • Contralateral differences in ankle SBP and pulse wave velocity (PWV) are significant indicators of increased mortality risk in older adults.
  • Routine evaluation of these peripheral vascular measures may enhance cardiovascular risk stratification.
Abstract

Related Concept Videos

Pulse Assessment Sites01:11

Pulse Assessment Sites

Pulse assessment sites are crucial in evaluating a patient's cardiovascular health. By assessing the pulsations of arteries at specific anatomical locations, healthcare professionals can gather valuable information about blood flow, heart rate, and peripheral circulation. Understanding these pulse assessment sites is essential for conducting comprehensive cardiovascular evaluations and monitoring patients' overall health. These sites are strategically chosen due to the accessibility and...
1.0K
Pre-Procedural Guidelines for Assessing Blood Pressure01:10

Pre-Procedural Guidelines for Assessing Blood Pressure

Accurate blood pressure assessment is crucial for diagnosing and managing various health conditions. To ensure the reliability of these measurements, healthcare professionals must adhere to standardized pre-procedural guidelines. These guidelines enhance patient safety and improve the overall quality of healthcare. The following steps are essential for obtaining accurate and consistent blood pressure readings, from using the appropriate tools to ensuring effective communication with the...
542
Measurement of Blood Pressure01:17

Measurement of Blood Pressure

Assessing blood pressure is a standard procedure executed in virtually all medical environments. The method utilized today was established over a hundred years ago by an innovative Russian doctor, Dr. Nikolai Korotkoff. The soft ticking noise, known as Korotkoff sounds, heard while taking blood pressure readings results from turbulent blood flow within the vessels. The apparatus required for this procedure includes a sphygmomanometer, a blood pressure cuff attached to a gauge, and a...
907
Special considerations while measuring blood pressure01:28

Special considerations while measuring blood pressure

When assessing blood pressure (BP), healthcare professionals must consider various factors and potential unexpected outcomes to ensure accurate readings and provide proper patient care. Adhering to these guidelines is essential to achieving the most reliable results.
Monitoring Both Arms:
Monitoring BP in both arms during the initial assessment is advisable, as the systolic value may differ by five to ten mm Hg between arms. For subsequent BP assessments, use the arm with the higher reading.
712