Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 7, 2026

Measuring the Complete-arch Distortion of an Optical Dental Impression
Published on: May 30, 2019
Comparison of Conventional and Digital Workflows in the Fabrication of Fixed Prostheses: A Systematic Review
Mousumi Mahato1, Sadananda Hota2, Amulya Jain3
1Prosthodontics, Kalinga Institute of Medical Sciences, Kalinga Institute of Industrial Technology (KIIT) DU, Bhubaneswar, IND.
Abstract:
When considering dental restorations, the use of fixed partial dentures is one of the most widely accepted treatment options. In the past, fabrication was done using traditional techniques and the conventional workflow was by far the popular method; however, nowadays digital workflows are being used as a means to produce the prosthesis. This systematic review aims to compare the workflows by considering their respective qualities, such as precision, efficiency, cost-effectiveness, and clinical performance. A complete search has been carried out to incorporate any relevant studies published between the years 2012 and 2023 in databases such as Scopus, Web of Science, PubMed, ScienceDirect, and Cochrane Library. Two independent reviewers screened articles for inclusion and assessed the studies' methodological quality rating via the NIH Tool. A total of 22 relevant articles were reviewed after a systematic search strategy. The main outcome of the review was digital workflows were found to reduce working time, eliminate the selection of trays, minimize material consumption, and enhance patient comfort and acceptance. The studies also showed that digital workflows resulted in greater patient satisfaction and higher success rates than conventional workflows. Workflows for digital dentistry demonstrated to be better than traditional ones due to the cost-effectiveness, accuracy, and time optimization for the fabrication of fixed prostheses.
Related Concept Videos
Virtual Work for a System of Connected Rigid Bodies
Next,...
Systematic Error: Methodological and Sampling Errors
Sampling errors originate from improper sampling methods or the wrong sample population. These errors can be minimized by refining the sampling strategy. Defective instruments or faulty calibrations are the sources of instrumental...
Quality Control
Quality control helps track data, visualize trends, and identify variations, making it easier to detect deviations that may affect the accuracy of an analysis. One way to do this is by generating a quality control chart, which...
Quality Assurance
Data Validation
Key parameters for method validation include:
Control Systems
At the heart...

