Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Uniform Depth Channel Flow: Problem Solving01:18

Uniform Depth Channel Flow: Problem Solving

61
To calculate the flow rate for a trapezoidal channel, first, identify the bottom width, side slope, and flow depth of the channel. The cross-sectional area (A) corresponding to the depth of flow (y), channel bottom width (B), and side slope (θ) is determined by:Next, calculate the wetted perimeter, which includes the bottom width and the sloped side lengths in contact with the water. Using the values of the cross-sectional area and the wetted perimeter, determine the hydraulic radius by...
61
Uniform Depth Channel Flow01:27

Uniform Depth Channel Flow

67
Uniform depth channel flow keeps fluid depth consistent along channels such as irrigation canals. In natural channels, such as rivers, approximate uniform flow is often assumed. This condition occurs when the channel’s bottom slope matches the energy slope, balancing potential energy lost from gravity with head loss due to shear stress. This balance prevents depth changes along the channel length, resulting in a steady, uniform flow.Uniform flow in open channels with a constant cross-section...
67
Irrotational Flow01:28

Irrotational Flow

442
Irrotational flow is characterized by fluid motion where particles do not rotate around their axes, resulting in zero vorticity. For a flow to be irrotational, the curl of the velocity field must be zero. This imposes specific conditions on velocity gradients. For instance, to maintain zero rotation about the z-axis, the gradient condition:
442
Eulerian and Lagrangian Flow Descriptions01:22

Eulerian and Lagrangian Flow Descriptions

1.4K
Fluid flow analysis is critical in many scientific and engineering disciplines, and two principal approaches are used to describe this flow: the Eulerian and Lagrangian methods. These methods offer different perspectives on monitoring and analyzing the motion of fluids, each with distinct advantages depending on the scenario.
The Eulerian method focuses on fixed points in space where fluid properties, such as velocity, pressure, and temperature, are observed as the fluid moves between these...
1.4K
Steady Flow of a Fluid Stream01:27

Steady Flow of a Fluid Stream

278
Consider a control volume, such as a pipe with solid boundaries, through which fluid flows and changes direction due to the impulse exerted by the resulting force from the pipe walls. In steady flow, the mass of fluid entering the control volume at a given time, t, with velocity v1, is equal to the mass leaving after infinitesimal time dt, with velocity v2.
During this process, the momentum of the fluid within the control volume remains constant over the time interval dt. By applying the...
278
Bernoulli's Equation for Flow Normal to a Streamline01:16

Bernoulli's Equation for Flow Normal to a Streamline

841
Bernoulli's equation for flow normal to a streamline explains how pressure varies across curved streamlines due to the outward centrifugal forces induced by the fluid's curvature. The pressure is higher on the inner side of the curve, near the center of curvature, and decreases outward to balance these centrifugal forces.
The pressure difference depends on the fluid's velocity and radius of curvature. The pressure variation is minimal in flows with nearly straight streamlines.
841

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

The role of attention in perceptual biases in patients with schizophrenia spectrum disorder and healthy controls.

European archives of psychiatry and clinical neuroscience·2026
Same author

Visual cues and strategies for perceiving elasticity.

Proceedings. Biological sciences·2026
Same author

Human gloss perception reproduced by tiny neural networks.

Nature human behaviour·2026
Same author

Visual working memory-related corrective saccade biases are amplified by task demands, without updating working memory content.

Attention, perception & psychophysics·2026
Same author

Observing interoceptive threat: Gaze and pupillary responses reveal observational fear learning of aversive bodily symptoms in others.

Behaviour research and therapy·2026
Same author

Filling-in of the foveal rod scotoma and confidence preference for central vision under mesopic viewing conditions.

Vision research·2026

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jun 21, 2025

Profiling Maternal Behavior Responses During Whole-Brain Imaging
07:12

Profiling Maternal Behavior Responses During Whole-Brain Imaging

Published on: January 24, 2025

674

A simple optical flow model explains why certain object viewpoints are special.

Emma E M Stewart1,2,3, Roland W Fleming4,5, Alexander C Schütz5,6

  • 1School of Biological and Behavioural Sciences, Queen Mary University London , London E14NS, UK.

Proceedings. Biological Sciences
|July 9, 2024
PubMed
Summary

Object recognition is challenging due to varying views. This study reveals front and back views are crucial for object discrimination, explained by a computational model of projected optical flow.

Keywords:
perspectival appearancethree-dimensional object perceptionviewpoint perception

More Related Videos

Determining 3D Flow Fields via Multi-camera Light Field Imaging
14:25

Determining 3D Flow Fields via Multi-camera Light Field Imaging

Published on: March 6, 2013

16.6K
Investigating the Three-dimensional Flow Separation Induced by a Model Vocal Fold Polyp
09:58

Investigating the Three-dimensional Flow Separation Induced by a Model Vocal Fold Polyp

Published on: February 3, 2014

8.5K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jun 21, 2025

Profiling Maternal Behavior Responses During Whole-Brain Imaging
07:12

Profiling Maternal Behavior Responses During Whole-Brain Imaging

Published on: January 24, 2025

674
Determining 3D Flow Fields via Multi-camera Light Field Imaging
14:25

Determining 3D Flow Fields via Multi-camera Light Field Imaging

Published on: March 6, 2013

16.6K
Investigating the Three-dimensional Flow Separation Induced by a Model Vocal Fold Polyp
09:58

Investigating the Three-dimensional Flow Separation Induced by a Model Vocal Fold Polyp

Published on: February 3, 2014

8.5K

Area of Science:

  • Cognitive Science
  • Computer Vision
  • Neuroscience

Background:

  • Object recognition faces challenges with variable retinal input from different viewing angles.
  • The importance of specific object views (e.g., front, side) is known but not computationally explained.
  • Understanding the computational basis of visual comparisons is key to explaining view-specific performance.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate why certain object views are privileged in visual perception.
  • To computationally model the processes underlying visual comparisons between object views.
  • To explain variations in object pose discrimination based on viewing angle.

Main Methods:

  • Measured object pose discrimination across a wide range of objects and viewing angles.
  • Developed and tested a computational model based on projected three-dimensional optical flow between object views.
  • Compared model predictions with empirical discrimination performance data.

Main Results:

  • Significant variations in pose discrimination performance were observed, dependent on object type and viewing angle.
  • Front and back views consistently yielded superior object discrimination.
  • The computational model accurately predicted both successful and unsuccessful discrimination performance.

Conclusions:

  • Object pose discrimination performance is highly sensitive to viewing angle.
  • A simple, biologically plausible model of projected optical flow provides a computational explanation for privileged views.
  • This work offers insight into the computational mechanisms underlying object recognition and view invariance.