Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 5, 2026

Ultrasonographic Assessment During Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation
Published on: October 24, 2020
Do-not-attempt-resuscitation decision making: physicians' recommendations differ from the GO-FAR score predictions
David Olukolade Alao1,2, Snaha Abraham3, Emad Dababneh4
1Tawam Hospital, Al Ain, UAE. davidalao@uaeu.ac.ae.
Insights
The GO-FAR score aids in decisions about cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) following in-hospital cardiac arrest (IHCA). Physician recommendations and patient choices on CPR may vary due to complex medico-social factors.
Area of Science:
- Medical research
- Clinical decision-making
- Public health
Background:
- In-hospital cardiac arrest (IHCA) is a significant global cause of mortality.
- Survivors of IHCA often experience poor neurological outcomes, necessitating institutional care.
- Discussions on resuscitation outcomes are crucial for end-of-life decisions regarding cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR).
Purpose of the Study:
- To compare consultant-led do-not-resuscitate (DNR) decisions with GO-FAR score predictions for survival with good neurological outcomes after IHCA.
- To evaluate the utility of the GO-FAR score in predicting outcomes for patients with DNR orders.
Main Methods:
- Retrospective study of adult patients (≥18 years) with DNR orders over 12 months in a UAE tertiary institution.
- Abstraction of socio-demographic data and GO-FAR variables from electronic medical records.
- Application of the GO-FAR score to predict the probability of survival with good neurological outcomes.
Main Results:
- 788 patients received DNR orders; median age was 71 years, majority were males and expatriates.
- GO-FAR score predicted low/very low survival probability for 56% and average/above for 44% of patients.
- Higher in-hospital mortality observed in the average/above-average GO-FAR probability group (70%) compared to low/very low (56.5%).
Conclusions:
- The GO-FAR score serves as a valuable tool for shared decision-making regarding CPR outcomes after IHCA.
- Physician recommendations and patient resuscitation choices can be influenced by complex medico-social factors beyond the GO-FAR score.
Background And Aim:
In-hospital cardiac arrest (IHCA) is a major cause of mortality globally, and over 50% of the survivors will require institutional care as a result of poor neurological outcome. It is important that physicians discuss the likely outcome of resuscitation with patients and families during end-of-life discussions to help them with decisions about cardiopulmonary resuscitation. We aim to compare three consultants' do-not-resuscitate (DNR) decisions with the GO-FAR score predictions of the probability of survival with good neurological outcomes following in-hospital cardiac arrest (IHCA).
Methods:
This is a retrospective study of all patients 18 years or older placed on a DNR order by a consensus of three consultants in a tertiary institution in the United Arab Emirates over 12 months. Patients' socio-demographics and the GO-FAR variables were abstracted from the electronic medical records. We applied the GO-FAR score and the probability of survival with good neurological outcomes for each patient.
Results:
A total of 788 patients received a DNR order, with a median age of 71 years and a majority being males and expatriates. The GO-FAR model categorized 441 (56%) of the patients as having a low or very low probability of survival and 347 (44%) as average or above. There were 219 patients with a primary diagnosis of cancer, of whom 148 (67.6%) were in the average and above-average probability groups. There were more In-hospital deaths among patients in the average and above-average probability of survival group compared with those with very low and low probability (243 (70%) versus 249 (56.5%) (P < 0.0001)). The DNR patients with an average or above average chance of survival by GO-FAR score were more likely to be expatriates, oncology patients, and did not have sepsis.
Conclusions:
The GO-FAR score provides a guide for joint decision-making on the possible outcomes of CPR in the event of IHCA. The physicians' recommendation and the ultimate patient's resuscitation choice may differ due to more complex contextual medico-social factors.
Related Concept Videos
Assessment of Ventilation I: Respiratory Rate
A Ventilation assessment is critical for monitoring a patient's health status. Respiration, one of the most accessible vital signs, provides insights into the function of numerous body systems and can indicate serious health issues, such as brainstem injuries from head trauma.
Critical Guidelines for Assessing Ventilation:
Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation I: Adult
Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation II: ACLS Airway Management
Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation III: AED Use
Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation IV: Pharmacological Management
Heart Failure V: Medical Management

