Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 21, 2025

Selecting Multiple Biomarker Subsets with Similarly Effective Binary Classification Performances
Published on: October 11, 2018
Averse to what: Consumer aversion to algorithmic labels, but not their outputs?
Shwetha Mariadassou1, Anne-Kathrin Klesse1, Johannes Boegershausen1
1Erasmus University Rotterdam, Rotterdam School of Management, the Netherlands.
Abstract:
Inspired by significant technical advancements, a rapidly growing stream of research explores human lay beliefs and reactions surrounding AI tools, which employ algorithms to mimic elements of human intelligence. This literature predominantly documents negative reactions to these tools or the underlying algorithms, often referred to as algorithm aversion or, alternatively, a preference for humans. This article proposes a third interpretation: people may be averse to their labels, but appreciative of their output. This perspective offers three core insights for how we study people's reactions to algorithms. Research would benefit from (1) carefully considering the labeling of AI tools, (2) broadening the scope of study to include interactions with these tools, and (3) accounting for their technical configuration.
Related Concept Videos
Stereotype Content Model
Quantifying and Rejecting Outliers: The Grubbs Test
Labeling Emotion
Stereotypes, Prejudice, and Discrimination
Labeling DNA Probes
Radioisotopes, fluorophores, or small molecule binding partners like biotin or digoxigenin, are the most widely used reporter tags for labeling DNA probes. These labels can be attached to the probe DNA molecule via...
Confirmation Biases

