Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 21, 2025

Competing-Risk Nomogram for Predicting Cancer-Specific Survival in Multiple Primary Colorectal Cancer Patients after Surgery
Published on: September 27, 2024
Survival prediction in second primary breast cancer patients with machine learning: An analysis of SEER database
Yafei Wu1, Yaheng Zhang2, Siyu Duan2
1School of Public Health, Xiamen University, Xiang'an South Road, Xiang'an District, Xiamen, Fujian 361102, China; Key Laboratory of Health Technology Assessment of Fujian Province, Xiamen, Fujian, China; School of Nursing, Faculty of Health and Social Sciences, The Hong Kong Polytechnic University, Hong Kong SAR, China.
Background:
Studies have found that first primary cancer (FPC) survivors are at high risk of developing second primary breast cancer (SPBC). However, there is a lack of prognostic studies specifically focusing on patients with SPBC.
Methods:
This retrospective study used data from Surveillance, Epidemiology and End Results Program. We selected female FPC survivors diagnosed with SPBC from 12 registries (from January 1998 to December 2018) to construct prognostic models. Meanwhile, SPBC patients selected from another five registries (from January 2010 to December 2018) were used as the validation set to test the model's generalization ability. Four machine learning models and a Cox proportional hazards regression (CoxPH) were constructed to predict the overall survival of SPBC patients. Univariate and multivariate Cox regression analyses were used for feature selection. Model performance was assessed using time-dependent area under the ROC curve (t-AUC) and integrated Brier score (iBrier).
Results:
A total of 10,321 female FPC survivors with SPBC (mean age [SD]: 66.03 [11.17]) were included for model construction. These patients were randomly split into a training set (mean age [SD]: 65.98 [11.15]) and a test set (mean age [SD]: 66.15 [11.23]) with a ratio of 7:3. In validation set, a total of 3,638 SPBC patients (mean age [SD]: 66.28 [10.68]) were finally enrolled. Sixteen features were selected for model construction through univariate and multivariable Cox regression analyses. Among five models, random survival forest model showed excellent performance with a t-AUC of 0.805 (95 %CI: 0.803 - 0.807) and an iBrier of 0.123 (95 %CI: 0.122 - 0.124) on testing set, as well as a t-AUC of 0.803 (95 %CI: 0.801 - 0.807) and an iBrier of 0.098 (95 %CI: 0.096 - 0.103) on validation set. Through feature importance ranking, the top one and other top five key predictive features of the random survival forest model were identified, namely age, stage, regional nodes positive, latency, radiotherapy, and surgery.
Conclusions:
The random survival forest model outperformed CoxPH and other machine learning models in predicting the overall survival of patients with SPBC, which was helpful for the monitoring of high-risk populations.
More Related Videos
Related Concept Videos
Cancer Survival Analysis
Kaplan-Meier Approach
Comparing the Survival Analysis of Two or More Groups
Actuarial Approach
Consider the example of a high-risk surgical procedure with significant early-stage mortality. A two-year clinical study is conducted,...

