Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 21, 2025
Endoscopic Bilateral Nipple-sparing Mastectomy via a Single Axillary Incision with Immediate Pre-pectoral Implant-based Breast Reconstruction
Published on: May 17, 2024
Complications of Superomedial Versus Inferior Pedicle Reduction Mammaplasty: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
Zheng-Qiang Cang1, Yu Zhang1, Si-Qi Mu1
1Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Xijing Hospital, Fourth Military Medical University, No. 127 Changle West Road, Xi'an, 710032, Shaanxi, China.
Background:
The superomedial pedicle reduction mammoplasty has gained popularity and is an important alternative approach for reduction mammoplasty, while the inferior pedicle reduction mammaplasty remains by far the most performed as it is considered to provide the best vascularization to the nipple-areola complex, allowing safe removal of large amount of redundant tissue. The authors conducted the first systematic review and meta-analysis in an attempt to declare the differences of the superomedial pedicle versus the inferior pedicle reduction technique by comparing the postoperative complications.
Methods:
PubMed, MEDLINE, and Cochrane Library for clinical studies were queried from inception to January 1, 2024. Review Manager Version 5.4 was used for this meta-analysis. A random effects model was applied to OR, and 95%CI were determined using the Mantel-Haenszel method. The I2 test was used to assess heterogeneity, and the Newcastle-Ottawa scale was used to assess the risk of bias in the nonrandomized studies.
Results:
Twelve observational comparative studies were included. The superomedial pedicle technique had a statistically lower rate of overall complications (OR 0.59, 95% CI 0.47-0.75; p < 0.0001) and delayed wound healing (OR 0.46, 95% CI 0.33-0.64; p < 0.00001) than the inferior pedicle technique. No significant differences in wound dehiscence, infection, seroma, hematoma, skin necrosis, fat necrosis, NAC necrosis, nipple sensation decrease or loss, asymmetry, hypertrophic scarring, and reoperation were noted.
Conclusions:
Both two techniques are equally safe and reliable, while the superomedial pedicle technique resulted in a statistically lower rate of overall complications and delayed wound healing.
Level Of Evidence Iii:
This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266 .
