Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 30, 2026

Optimized Management of Endovascular Treatment for Acute Ischemic Stroke
Published on: January 18, 2018
Immediate versus staged complete revascularisation in patients presenting with STEMI and multivessel disease
Paola Scarparo1, Jacob J Elscot1, Hala Kakar1
1Department of Cardiology, Thoraxcenter, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, the Netherlands.
Insights
Immediate complete revascularisation (ICR) and staged complete revascularisation (SCR) showed similar 1-year clinical outcomes for ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) patients. While ICR trended towards better outcomes at 30 days, both strategies proved comparable in the long term.
Area of Science:
- Cardiology
- Interventional Cardiology
- Clinical Trials
Background:
- Complete revascularisation is recommended for ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) with multivessel disease (MVD).
- The optimal timing for revascularising non-culprit lesions remains a subject of debate.
- Previous trials support complete revascularisation in STEMI patients without cardiogenic shock.
Purpose of the Study:
- To compare immediate complete revascularisation (ICR) versus staged complete revascularisation (SCR) in STEMI patients with MVD.
- To evaluate the impact of ICR versus SCR on key clinical outcomes at one year.
- To analyze secondary endpoints including mortality, myocardial infarction, and cerebrovascular events.
Main Methods:
- A prespecified analysis of the BioVasc trial was conducted.
- STEMI patients with MVD were randomized to either ICR or SCR groups.
- The primary endpoint was a composite of all-cause mortality, myocardial infarction, unplanned revascularisation, or cerebrovascular events at 1-year follow-up.
Main Results:
- No significant difference in the primary endpoint was observed between ICR and SCR groups at 1 year (7.0% vs 8.3%, HR 0.84, p=0.55).
- Individual components of the primary endpoint, including mortality, myocardial infarction, and cerebrovascular events, did not differ significantly between the groups.
- A trend towards a reduction in the primary endpoint was noted at 30 days favoring ICR (3.0% vs 6.0%, HR 0.50, p=0.09).
- ICR was associated with a significantly shorter hospital stay (median 3 days vs 4 days, p<0.001).
Conclusions:
- One-year clinical outcomes were similar for STEMI patients undergoing immediate versus staged complete revascularisation.
- While immediate revascularisation may offer early benefits and reduce hospital stay, long-term results are comparable to staged procedures.
- The findings contribute to the ongoing discussion regarding the optimal timing of complete revascularisation in STEMI patients with MVD.
Background:
Complete revascularisation is supported by recent trials in patients with ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) and multivessel disease (MVD) without cardiogenic shock. However, the optimal timing of non-culprit lesion revascularisation is currently debated.
Aims:
This prespecified analysis of the BioVasc trial aims to determine the effect of immediate complete revascularisation (ICR) compared to staged complete revascularisation (SCR) on clinical outcomes in patients with STEMI.
Methods:
Patients presenting with STEMI and MVD were randomly assigned to ICR or SCR. The primary endpoint was the composite of all-cause mortality, myocardial infarction, any unplanned ischaemia-driven revascularisation, or cerebrovascular events at 1-year post-index procedure.
Results:
Between June 2018 and October 2021, 608 (ICR: 305, SCR: 303) STEMI patients were enrolled. No significant differences between ICR and SCR were observed at 1-year follow-up in terms of the primary endpoint (7.0% vs 8.3%, hazard ratio [HR] 0.84, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.47-1.50; p=0.55): all-cause mortality (2.3% vs 1.3%, HR 1.77, 95% CI: 0.52-6.04; p=0.36), myocardial infarction (1.7% vs 3.3%, HR 0.50, 95% CI: 0.17-1.47; p=0.21), unplanned ischaemia-driven revascularisation (4.1% vs 5.0%, HR 0.80, 95% CI: 0.38-1.71; p=0.57) and cerebrovascular events (1.4% vs 1.3%, HR 1.01, 95% CI: 0.25-4.03; p=0.99). At 30-day follow-up, a trend towards a reduction of the primary endpoint in the ICR group was observed (ICR: 3.0% vs SCR: 6.0%, HR 0.50, 95% CI: 0.22-1.11; p=0.09). ICR was associated with a reduction in overall hospital stay (ICR: median 3 [interquartile range {IQR} 2-5] days vs SCR: median 4 [IQR 3-6] days; p<0.001).
Conclusions:
Clinical outcomes at 1 year were similar for STEMI patients who had undergone ICR and those who had undergone SCR.
More Related Videos
Related Concept Videos
Coronary Artery Disease V: Interprofessional Care
Acute Coronary Syndrome I: Introduction
Acute Coronary Syndrome III: Diagnostic Studies
Acute Coronary Syndrome IV: Interprofessional Care

