Modification of growth and development of muscles of poultry

Growth curves of selected and unselected lines of broilers and Japanese quail show that chicks respond to selection for 8-week or 4-week body mass, respectively, by increasing the exponential growth rate during the first 2 weeks after hatching. Comparative studies indicate that growth rate varies among species of birds according to adult body mass, developmental maturity of the chick at hatching, and the postnatal growth increments of the skeletal muscles of the legs. Differentiation of tissues leading to mature function apparently precludes embryonic function and decreases proliferation and growth. Precocial species, such as the domestic fowl, grow only one-quarter as fast, on average, as altricial species of the same size, whose chicks are less mature at hatching and depend more on parental care for food, warmth, and protection. Among precocial species, those whose legs have the smallest postnatal growth increments grow most rapidly overall. The domestic fowl is among the slowest growing of precocial species. Although diet quality may limit growth rate, this should not be a factor in selection programs, because high quality diets can be provided. Rate of food assimilation apparently also is limiting, but it can be increased experimentally by force feeding and presumably is sufficiently selectable so as not to limit breeding programs designed to increase growth rate. The response of broilers and quail to selection of body mass apparently affects the rate of proliferation of skeletal muscles during the early posthatching period. Muscle quality is not affected. There is inconclusive evidence of a shift in muscle cell nuclei from differentiated to proliferative pools in selected lines. Furthermore, selected broilers apparently are less capable than unselected chicks of generating body heat, which requires functional skeletal muscle during the first week posthatching. Growth performance of broilers might be increased beyond present levels by selecting directly for reduced or delayed maturity (e.g., thermogenesis, flight) of chicks during the first 2 weeks and by selecting smaller legs in adult birds. Any attempt to formulate a selection program on these ideas would require additional basic research and might be thwarted by economic considerations or by offsetting selection caused by phenotypic responses that strain certain functional relationships in the growing chick.