Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Timing and Consequences on Behavior01:08

Timing and Consequences on Behavior

88
In operant conditioning, the timing of reinforcement is crucial. For animals like rats and cats, immediate reinforcement (within a few seconds) is much more effective than delayed reinforcement. For example, a food reward for a rat needs to follow within 30 seconds of pressing a bar to be effective. 
Humans, however, can respond to delayed reinforcers. We often make decisions between immediate small rewards and delayed larger rewards. This ability to delay gratification is a significant...
88
Milgram's Obedience to Authority02:20

Milgram's Obedience to Authority

6.4K
Obedience to authority is classically demonstrated in a more famous series of social psychology experiments performed by Stanley Milgram. He was a social psychology professor at Yale who was influenced by the trial of Adolf Eichmann, a Nazi war criminal. Eichmann’s defense for the atrocities he committed was that he was “just following orders.”
6.4K
Kohlberg's Theory of Moral Development01:19

Kohlberg's Theory of Moral Development

47
Kohlberg's theory of moral development uses the Heinz dilemma — a thought experiment in which a man, Heinz, must decide whether to steal an unaffordable drug to save his dying wife — to illustrate the evolution of moral reasoning. This framework, divided into three levels with two stages, highlights how individuals' understanding of right and wrong becomes increasingly complex.
Pre-Conventional Level
At the pre-conventional level, morality is primarily driven by personal...
47
Punishment01:27

Punishment

167
Negative reinforcement and punishment are often confused but serve distinct functions in behavior modification. Reinforcement, whether positive or negative, increases the likelihood of a desired behavior, while punishment decreases it.
Punishment can be positive or negative. Positive punishment involves adding an undesirable stimulus, such as scolding, to decrease a behavior. Negative punishment involves removing a desirable stimulus, such as taking away a favorite toy, to decrease behavior....
167
The Stanford Prison Experiment03:20

The Stanford Prison Experiment

23.1K
The famous and controversial Stanford Prison Experiment, conducted by social psychologist Philip Zimbardo and his colleagues at Stanford University, demonstrated the power of social roles, social norms, and scripts.
23.1K
Reason and Intuition01:37

Reason and Intuition

6.4K
The human brain processes information for decision-making using one of two routes: an intuitive system and a rational system (Epstein, 1994; popularized by Kahneman, 2011 as System 1 and System 2, respectively). The intuitive system is quick, impulsive, and operates with minimal effort, relying on emotions or habits to provide cues for what to do next, while the rational system is logical, analytical, deliberate, and methodical. Research in neuropsychology suggests that the...
6.4K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Detection of culprit presence in multiple-culprit crimes: A comparison of combined and separate lineup-presentation formats.

PloS one·2026
Same author

Validating a multinomial processing tree model for measuring confidence in lineups using a post-response feedback manipulation.

Cognitive research: principles and implications·2026
Same author

Adaptive memory: The effects of survival-constrained retrieval on recognition depend on initial encoding conditions.

Memory & cognition·2025
Same author

Delays reduce culprit-presence detection but do not affect guessing-based selection in response to lineups.

Scientific reports·2025
Same author

Evidence for age-related differences in culprit-presence detection and guessing-based selection in lineups.

Psychology and aging·2025
Same author

The illusory-truth effect and its absence under accuracy-focused processing are robust across contexts of low and high advertising exposure.

Cognitive research: principles and implications·2025

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jun 21, 2025

Measuring Delay Discounting in Humans Using an Adjusting Amount Task
07:47

Measuring Delay Discounting in Humans Using an Adjusting Amount Task

Published on: January 9, 2016

15.3K

Time pressure and deliberation affect moral punishment.

Ana Philippsen1, Laura Mieth2, Axel Buchner2

  • 1Department of Experimental Psychology, Heinrich Heine University Düsseldorf, Universitätsstrasse 1, 40225, Düsseldorf, Germany. Ana.Philippsen@hhu.de.

Scientific Reports
|July 16, 2024
PubMed
Summary

Moral punishment decreases under time pressure but increases with deliberation. However, deliberating self-interest reduces punishment, suggesting context-specific effects on moral decision-making.

Keywords:
Cognitive resourcesCooperationDeliberationMultinomial processing tree modelPunishment

More Related Videos

A Procedure to Study Stress-Induced Relapse of Heroin Seeking after Punishment-Imposed Abstinence
08:05

A Procedure to Study Stress-Induced Relapse of Heroin Seeking after Punishment-Imposed Abstinence

Published on: March 23, 2022

2.5K
The Joint Effect of Social Comparison and Social Distance on Evaluation of Intertemporal Choice Outcomes in Event-related Potential Studies
08:24

The Joint Effect of Social Comparison and Social Distance on Evaluation of Intertemporal Choice Outcomes in Event-related Potential Studies

Published on: August 25, 2023

688

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jun 21, 2025

Measuring Delay Discounting in Humans Using an Adjusting Amount Task
07:47

Measuring Delay Discounting in Humans Using an Adjusting Amount Task

Published on: January 9, 2016

15.3K
A Procedure to Study Stress-Induced Relapse of Heroin Seeking after Punishment-Imposed Abstinence
08:05

A Procedure to Study Stress-Induced Relapse of Heroin Seeking after Punishment-Imposed Abstinence

Published on: March 23, 2022

2.5K
The Joint Effect of Social Comparison and Social Distance on Evaluation of Intertemporal Choice Outcomes in Event-related Potential Studies
08:24

The Joint Effect of Social Comparison and Social Distance on Evaluation of Intertemporal Choice Outcomes in Event-related Potential Studies

Published on: August 25, 2023

688

Area of Science:

  • Moral Psychology
  • Behavioral Economics
  • Game Theory

Background:

  • Moral punishment decisions are influenced by cognitive processes, with competing theories suggesting either intuitive or deliberate processing.
  • Understanding these processes is key to explaining variations in moral judgment and behavior.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate the impact of time pressure and deliberation on moral punishment.
  • To differentiate between intuitive and deliberate morality accounts of punishment.
  • To examine how the content of deliberation (self-interest vs. fairness) modulates moral punishment.

Main Methods:

  • Three experiments using a one-shot Prisoner's Dilemma game with costly punishment.
  • Manipulations included time pressure, delayed (deliberative) decisions, and guided deliberation (self-interest vs. fairness).
  • Analysis employed the cooperation-and-punishment model to distinguish punishment types.

Main Results:

  • Time pressure significantly decreased moral punishment.
  • Deliberation, in general, increased moral punishment, supporting the deliberate-morality account.
  • Deliberating self-interest, compared to fairness, led to decreased moral punishment.

Conclusions:

  • Evidence supports a deliberate-morality account, but with important nuances.
  • The effect of deliberation on moral punishment is context-dependent and modulated by the focus of deliberation.
  • Results advance a process-based understanding of moral punishment, highlighting the role of specific cognitive processes.