Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 25, 2026

Use of Two Intracorporeal Ventricular Assist Devices As a Total Artificial Heart
Published on: May 11, 2018
Mechanical Circulatory Support in Pediatric Myocarditis: Support Strategies and Outcomes in a Nationally
Alicia M Kamsheh1, Jonathan B Edelson2, Jennifer Faerber3
1Division of Pediatric Cardiology, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO.
Insights
Mechanical circulatory support (MCS) is increasingly used for pediatric myocarditis, with extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) being most common. While mortality remains high, outcomes do not significantly differ between ECMO and other MCS strategies in this patient population.
Area of Science:
- Pediatric Cardiology
- Critical Care Medicine
- Cardiovascular Surgery
Background:
- Myocarditis frequently causes pediatric heart failure, often necessitating mechanical circulatory support (MCS).
- Understanding MCS strategies and outcomes in pediatric myocarditis is crucial for improving patient care.
Purpose of the Study:
- To describe the utilization of various MCS strategies in a nationwide cohort of pediatric patients diagnosed with myocarditis.
- To identify temporal trends in MCS use for pediatric myocarditis.
- To compare patient outcomes across different MCS strategies.
Main Methods:
- Utilized the Kids' Inpatient Database (KID), a national administrative discharge data sample from 2003-2016.
- Identified pediatric myocarditis admissions using ICD-9/10 codes.
- Compared MCS outcomes using logistic regression analysis.
Main Results:
- MCS was employed in 7.5% of 5,661 pediatric myocarditis admissions.
- Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) was the predominant MCS strategy (73.6%), including extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation (ECPR).
- Mortality was high (28.3%) among patients receiving MCS, with no significant differences in mortality observed between VAD-only/combination MCS and non-ECPR ECMO groups.
Conclusions:
- Mechanical circulatory support is utilized in approximately 1 in 13 pediatric myocarditis cases, with increasing trends over time.
- ECMO remains the most frequently used MCS modality, despite high overall mortality.
- Further prospective studies are needed to definitively assess the comparative effectiveness of different MCS modalities in pediatric myocarditis.
Background:
Myocarditis is a common cause of pediatric heart failure which may require mechanical circulatory support (MCS). The purpose of this study is to describe MCS strategies used in a nationwide cohort of pediatric patients with myocarditis, identify trends over time, and compare outcomes between MCS strategies.
Methods:
This study utilized the Kids' Inpatient Database (KID), a national sample of administrative discharge data. KID admissions from 2003-2016 were queried using ICD-9/10 codes to identify those with a diagnosis of myocarditis. MCS outcomes were compared using logistic regression.
Results:
Of 5,661 admissions for myocarditis, MCS was used in 424 (7.5%), comprised of extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) in 312 (73.6%), including 32 (10.2%) instances of extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation (ECPR), temporary ventricular assist devices (tVAD) in 28 (6.6%), durable VAD (dVAD) in 42 (9.9%) and combination MCS in 42 (9.9%). MCS use increased over time (p=0.031), but MCS strategies did not significantly change. Mortality was high in the MCS group (28.3%). There was no difference in odds of death in the VAD only or combination MCS group compared to the non-ECPR ECMO group (p=0.07 and p=0.65, respectively).
Conclusion:
MCS is used in 1 in 13 pediatric myocarditis cases, and MCS use is increasing over time with ECMO remaining the most frequently used modality. Mortality remains high in patients that receive MCS but does not differ between those receiving VAD or combination MCS as compared to non-ECPR ECMO on unadjusted analysis. Further prospective analysis is required to evaluate the relative effectiveness of MCS modalities in this disease.
Related Concept Videos
Myocarditis III: Medical Management
Myocarditis IV: Nursing Management
Cardiomyopathy II: Dilated Cardiomyopathy
Cardiomyopathy III: Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy
Cardiomyopathy V: Interprofessional Care

