Related Experiment Videos
Cardiac transplantation. Changing patterns in evaluation and treatment
Annals of Surgery
|October 1, 1985
Summary
This study on heart transplants found that switching to cyclosporine and low-dose steroids reduced serious infections. Researchers believe this improved immune suppression leads to better graft survival and specific unresponsiveness.
Area of Science:
- Cardiovascular Surgery
- Immunosuppression
- Transplantation Immunology
Background:
- Early heart transplant series (1977-1985) experienced high rates of serious infectious complications.
- The need for effective immunosuppression to balance graft survival and infection risk was evident.
Purpose of the Study:
- To report experience with 66 heart transplants in 64 patients over an 8-year period.
- To evaluate the impact of a modified immunosuppressive regimen on patient outcomes, particularly infection rates.
- To investigate potential mechanisms of graft adaptation and specific unresponsiveness post-transplant.
Main Methods:
- Retrospective analysis of 66 heart transplant cases performed between 1977 and 1985.
- Comparison of outcomes before and after a change in immunosuppressive protocol in April 1983 (introduction of cyclosporine and low-dose steroids).
- Monitoring included frequent myocardial biopsies and serum cyclosporine level determinations.
Main Results:
- A significant reduction in the frequency and severity of serious infections was observed after the change to cyclosporine and low-dose steroids.
- The modified regimen appeared to improve overall outcomes, although the study was not controlled.
Conclusions:
- Altered immune suppression, specifically the use of cyclosporine and low-dose steroids, is associated with improved outcomes in heart transplantation.
- Patients with successful cardiac grafts may develop specific unresponsiveness, a phenomenon warranting further investigation into its underlying mechanisms.