An OpenSim thoracolumbar spine model applying a bottom-up modelling approach is similar to a top-down approach

The kinetic demands of the spine can be assessed using a top-down (TD) or bottom-up (BU) approach, which start calculations from the either the hands or from the feet, respectively. Biomechanists have traditionally favored a BU approach, though existing modeling approaches encourage a TD approach. Regardless of the approach the demands should be similar, provided the external forces and linked segment parameters are equivalently measured and modeled. Demonstrating a level of agreement between the two approaches can help evaluate a model. Further, having both approaches can be advantageous when data is inaccurate or unavailable for one. The purpose of this study was to compare the internal moments and forces at multiple lumbar and thoracic intervertebral joint (IVJ) levels during lifting tasks from an established OpenSim thoracolumbar spine model that applies a TD approach and a similar model modified to adopt a BU approach. Kinematics and external forces were recorded from twelve participants during sagittal and lateral lifts of different lifting speeds and crate masses. For both approaches IVJ kinetics were estimated using a standard OpenSim modeling pipeline. The BU and TD approach IVJ joint moments generally agreed both temporally (R² = .94 ± .17) and in magnitude (RMSE=6.2 ± 3.5 Nm) of the primary planes of movement. There were however some temporal fit exceptions for off axes moments with low magnitudes (i.e., < 10 Nm). Bland-Altman plots also indicated acceptable agreement for IVJ peak forces (BU-TD difference of 12 ± 111 and 8 ± 31 N in compression and resultant shear, respectfully). These results support the application of the BU approach and the assigned linked segment parameters of the model. The new BU model is available on the SimTK site (https://simtk.org/projects/spine_ribcage).