Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 24, 2026

Vagus Nerve Stimulation as a Tool to Induce Plasticity in Pathways Relevant for Extinction Learning
Published on: August 21, 2015
Vagus Nerve Stimulation Paired With Rehabilitation for Chronic Stroke: Characterizing Responders
Alexa Beovich1, Jessica Boose, Rachana Patel
1Emory Neurologic Physical Therapy Residency Program (A.B., R.P.), Doctor of Physical Therapy Program, Department of Rehabilitation Medicine (J.B.), Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia; Division of Physical Therapy, Department of Rehabilitation Medicine (S.L.W.), Emory University, School of Medicine, Atlanta, Georgia; Departments of Cell Biology and Medicine (S.L.W.), Woodruff School of Nursing, Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia; Atlanta VA Center for Visual and Neurocognitive Rehabilitation (S.L.W.), Decatur, Georgia.
Background And Purpose:
Implantable vagus nerve stimulation (VNS) paired with volitional upper extremity rehabilitation can improve impairment and function among moderately to severely impaired, chronic stroke survivors. This study is a retrospective analysis of the in-clinic rehabilitation phase of the blinded, placebo-controlled, randomized pivotal VNS-REHAB trial to determine whether dosing parameters during in-clinic paired VNS therapy were associated with responder status and whether covariates might impact that determination.
Methods:
Data were limited to 53 participants in the active VNS group who had received VNS implants prior to undergoing 6 weeks of in-clinic rehabilitation paired with VNS. Tasks were standardized across all participants. Dosing parameters included number of stimulations and task time. The primary outcome was the Fugl-Meyer Upper Extremity Assessment (FMA-UE), evaluated at the end of 6 weeks (Post-1). Participants were classified a priori as responders based on an improvement of ≥6 points on the FMA-UE from baseline to Post-1.
Results:
Dosing parameters were not associated with FMA-UE responder status at the end of 6 weeks. Covariates including age, gender, paretic hand, baseline severity, and chronicity of stroke were also not significant associations of response.
Discussion And Conclusions:
While responders to VNS could be defined, therapy dosing and participant attributes did not provide greater specification for association of responder status. Limitations of this study include small sample size and non-linearity of the FMA-UE. Future studies will include reassessing responder categorization using more linear scales and examining stroke lesion characteristics to determine whether these measures are more sensitive to dosing parameters.
Video Abstract Available:
for more insights from the authors (see the Video, Supplemental Digital Content 1, available at: http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink ).
More Related Videos
04:29Vagus Nerve Stimulation As an Adjunctive Neurostimulation Tool in Treatment-resistant Depression
Published on: January 7, 2019
05:28Author Spotlight: Enhancing Upper Limb Rehabilitation in Stroke Patients Through Advanced Robotic and Neuromodulation Technologies
Published on: October 11, 2024