Quantifying Geographic Atrophy in Age-Related Macular Degeneration: A Comparative Analysis Across 12 Deep Learning...

AI algorithms have shown impressive performance in segmenting geographic atrophy (GA) from fundus autofluorescence (FAF) images. However, selection of artificial intelligence (AI) architecture is an important variable in model development. Here, we explore 12 distinct AI architecture combinations to determine the most effective approach for GA segmentation.

We investigated various AI architectures, each with distinct combinations of encoders and decoders. The architectures included three decoders-FPN (Feature Pyramid Network), UNet, and PSPNet (Pyramid Scene Parsing Network)-and serve as the foundation framework for segmentation task. Encoders including EfficientNet, ResNet (Residual Networks), VGG (Visual Geometry Group) and Mix Vision Transformer (mViT) have a role in extracting optimum latent features for accurate GA segmentation. Performance was measured through comparison of GA areas between human and AI predictions and Dice Coefficient (DC).

The training dataset included 601 FAF images from AREDS2 study and validation included 156 FAF images from the GlaxoSmithKline study. The mean absolute difference between grader measured and AI predicted areas ranged from -0.08 (95% CI = -1.35, 1.19) to 0.73 mm2 (95% CI = -5.75,4.29) and DC between 0.884-0.993. The best-performing models were UNet and FPN frameworks with mViT, and the least-performing models were PSPNet framework.

The choice of AI architecture impacts GA segmentation performance. Vision transformers with FPN and UNet architectures demonstrate stronger suitability for this task compared to Convolutional Neural Network- and PSPNet-based models. Selecting an AI architecture must be tailored to the specific goals of the project, and developers should consider which architecture is ideal for their project.