Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 9, 2026

08:54
A Workflow to Quantitatively Determine Age-Related Macular Degeneration Lesion-Specific Variations in Fundus Autofluorescence
Published on: May 26, 2023
Comparison of Measurement Techniques for Photoreceptor Loss in Geographic Atrophy
Maria Schulz1, Nathan Macha1, Sairi Zhang1
1Wisconsin Reading Center, Department of Ophthalmology and Visual Sciences, University of Wisconsin, Madison, WI, USA.
Translational Vision Science & Technology
|July 8, 2026
Summary
Quantifying ellipsoid zone (EZ) and retinal pigment epithelium (RPE) loss in geographic atrophy (GA) differs between segmentation and edge detection methods. These findings impact clinical trial design and AI development for retinal biomarkers.
Area of Science:
- Ophthalmology
- Medical Imaging
- Artificial Intelligence
Background:
- Ellipsoid zone (EZ) loss is a key endpoint in geographic atrophy (GA) clinical trials.
- Accurate quantification of EZ and retinal pigment epithelium (RPE) loss is crucial for developing AI models for this biomarker.
Purpose of the Study:
- To compare segmentation and edge detection methods for quantifying EZ and RPE loss using optical coherence tomography (OCT).
- To evaluate the impact of measurement methods on EZ quantification in GA.
Main Methods:
- Analysis of OCT images from 50 eyes with GA.
- Comparison of segmentation (OCT Explorer) and edge detection (3D Slicer) techniques.
- Evaluation of longitudinal progression in 15 eyes over one year.
Main Results:
- Both methods showed high agreement for RPE loss (P = 0.53) and longitudinal changes (EZ P = 0.43, RPE P = 0.23).
- Segmentation yielded significantly larger EZ loss areas (P < 0.001) and EZ/RPE ratios (P < 0.001) compared to edge detection.
- Edge detection provided more conservative EZ boundaries, excluding areas over drusen.
Conclusions:
- Measurement methodology significantly influences EZ quantification in GA.
- Systematic differences exist between segmentation and edge detection, particularly for EZ measurements.
- Standardized ground truth development for AI requires careful consideration of chosen quantification methods.
