Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 19, 2025
Data Processing Methods for 3D Seismic Imaging of Subsurface Volcanoes: Applications to the Tarim Flood Basalt
Published on: August 7, 2017
A Comprehensive review of data-driven approaches for forecasting production from unconventional reservoirs: best
Hamid Rahmanifard1, Ian Gates1
1Department of Chemical and Petroleum Engineering, Schulich School of Engineering, University of Calgary, 2500 University Dr. NW, Calgary, AB T2N 1N4 Canada.
Abstract:
Prediction of well production from unconventional reservoirs is a complex problem given an incomplete understanding of physics despite large amounts of data. Recently, Data Analytics Techniques (DAT) have emerged as an effective approach for production forecasting for unconventional reservoirs. In some of these approaches, DAT are combined with physics-based models to capture the essential physical mechanisms of fluid flow in porous media, while leveraging the power of data-driven methods to account for uncertainties and heterogeneities. Here, we provide an overview of the applications and performance of DAT for production forecasting of unconventional reservoirs examining and comparing predictive models using different algorithms, validation benchmarks, input data, number of wells, and formation types. We also discuss the strengths and limitations of each model, as well as the challenges and opportunities for future research in this field. Our analysis shows that machine learning (ML) based models can achieve satisfactory performance in forecasting production from unconventional reservoirs. We measure the performance of the models using two dimensionless metrics: mean absolute percentage error (MAPE) and coefficient of determination (R2). The predicted and actual production data show a high degree of agreement, as most of the models have a low error rate and a strong correlation. Specifically, ~ 65% of the models have MAPE less than 20%, and more than 80% of the models have R2 higher than 0.6. Therefore, we expect that DAT can improve the reliability and robustness of production forecasting for unconventional resources. However, we also identify some areas for future improvement, such as developing new ML algorithms, combining DAT with physics-based models, and establishing multi-perspective approaches for comparing model performance.
Supplementary Information:
The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s10462-024-10865-5.
