Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 19, 2025

Inverse Probability of Treatment Weighting Propensity Score using the Military Health System Data Repository and National Death Index
Published on: January 8, 2020
Identifying pediatric hypertension in observational data: comparing clinical and claims cohorts in real-world data
Casie E Horgan1, Jillian Burk1, Efe Eworuke2
1Department of Population Medicine, Harvard Medical School and Harvard Pilgrim Health Care Institute, Boston, MA, United States.
Insights
Pediatric hypertension is under-captured in insurance claims data. Claims-based hypertension may indicate more severe disease, but requires understanding of coding practices for accurate research.
Area of Science:
- Public Health
- Pediatric Cardiology
- Health Informatics
Background:
- Pediatric hypertension is a growing concern.
- Accurate identification of pediatric hypertension in real-world data is crucial for research and clinical practice.
- Existing data sources may not fully capture the prevalence or severity of pediatric hypertension.
Purpose of the Study:
- To compare clinical and claims-based definitions of pediatric hypertension.
- To assess the concordance between clinical diagnosis and insurance claims for hypertension in children and adolescents.
- To evaluate the association between claims-based hypertension and disease severity or mortality.
Main Methods:
- Retrospective public health surveillance using data from 2006-2016.
- Utilized the US Food and Drug Administration's Sentinel System with 7 integrated delivery systems.
- Identified pediatric patients (3-17 years) using clinical and claims-based definitions for hypertension.
Main Results:
- Out of over 3.7 million pediatric patients, 9% of children and 8.7% of teens met the clinical definition of hypertension.
- Only 2.2% of clinically hypertensive children and 7.3% of teens had corresponding hypertension claims.
- Claims-based hypertension was associated with greater disease severity and higher all-cause mortality.
Conclusions:
- Insurance claims data under-capture pediatric hypertension.
- Claims-based hypertension may serve as a marker for increased disease severity.
- Researchers must consider coding practices when using real-world data for pediatric hypertension studies.
Abstract:
We conducted retrospective public health surveillance using data from 2006 to 2016 in 7 integrated delivery systems from the US Food and Drug Administration's Sentinel System. We identified pediatric hypertensive patients by clinical and claims-based definitions and compared demographics, baseline profiles, and follow-up time profiles. Among 3 757 803 pediatric patients aged 3 to 17 years, we identified 781 722 children and 551 246 teens with at least 3 blood pressure measurements over 36 months. Of these, 70 315 children (9%) and 47 928 teens (8.7%) met the clinical definition for hypertension, and 22 465 (2.8%) children and 60 952 (11%) of teens met the clinical definition for elevated, nonhypertensive blood pressure. Of the 3.7 million patients, we identified 3246 children and 7293 teens with any claim for hypertension (claims definition). Evidence of hypertension claims among those meeting our clinical definition was poor; 2.2% and 7.3% of clinically hypertensive children and teens had corresponding claims for hypertension. Baseline profiles for patients with claims-based hypertension suggest greater severity of disease compared with clinical patients. Claims-based patients had higher rates of all-cause mortality during follow-up. Pediatric hypertension in claims-based data sources is under-captured but may serve as a marker for greater disease severity. Investigators should understand coding practices when selecting real-world data sources for pediatric hypertension work.
More Related Videos
Related Concept Videos
Hypertension and Regulation of Blood Pressure
Errors occurring during blood pressure monitoring
Several factors...
Measurement of Blood Pressure
Special considerations while measuring blood pressure
Monitoring Both Arms:
Monitoring BP in both arms during the initial assessment is advisable, as the systolic value may differ by five to ten mm Hg between arms. For subsequent BP assessments, use the arm with the higher reading.
Pre-Procedural Guidelines for Assessing Blood Pressure
Hazard Ratio
For example, in a clinical trial...

