Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Physiology Still Matters: Lessons From FAVOR III China.

Journal of the American College of Cardiology·2026
Same author

Editorial: FFR/iFR discordance in AS - More a physiologic than anatomic cause?

Cardiovascular revascularization medicine : including molecular interventions·2026
Same author

Angiography-Derived Physiology for Coronary Artery Disease Assessment: Expert Opinion From a SCAI Roundtable.

Journal of the Society for Cardiovascular Angiography & Interventions·2026
Same author

Is the stress aortic valve index a fractional flow reserve for the stenotic aortic valve?

EuroIntervention : journal of EuroPCR in collaboration with the Working Group on Interventional Cardiology of the European Society of Cardiology·2026
Same author

Prognosis for Isolated Coronary Artery Ectasia: Hope for the Best, Expect the Worst.

Circulation. Cardiovascular interventions·2026
Same author

Coronary Artery Disease: Webcast October 22 2025.

Methodist DeBakey cardiovascular journal·2026

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jun 19, 2025

Remote Magnetic Navigation for Accurate, Real-time Catheter Positioning and Ablation in Cardiac Electrophysiology Procedures
09:13

Remote Magnetic Navigation for Accurate, Real-time Catheter Positioning and Ablation in Cardiac Electrophysiology Procedures

Published on: April 21, 2013

27.9K

Implementing a 'Lead [Apron]-Free' Cardiac Catheterization: Current Status.

Akash H Patel1, Vishal Patel1, Yicheng Tang1

  • 1Division of Cardiology, University of California, Irvine, California, USA.

Current Cardiology Reports
|July 25, 2024
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Novel radiation shielding and protective methods are emerging to reduce health risks for staff in cardiac catheterization labs (CCL). These innovations aim for a safer, lead apron-free environment by minimizing radiation exposure and orthopedic injuries.

Keywords:
Cardiac CatheterizationLead-FreeRadiation Safety

More Related Videos

Non-fluoroscopic Catheter Tracking for Fluoroscopy Reduction in Interventional Electrophysiology
10:46

Non-fluoroscopic Catheter Tracking for Fluoroscopy Reduction in Interventional Electrophysiology

Published on: May 26, 2015

13.3K
Benefits of Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy in an Asynchronous Heart Failure Model Induced by Left Bundle Branch Ablation and Rapid Pacing
12:45

Benefits of Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy in an Asynchronous Heart Failure Model Induced by Left Bundle Branch Ablation and Rapid Pacing

Published on: December 11, 2017

10.5K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jun 19, 2025

Remote Magnetic Navigation for Accurate, Real-time Catheter Positioning and Ablation in Cardiac Electrophysiology Procedures
09:13

Remote Magnetic Navigation for Accurate, Real-time Catheter Positioning and Ablation in Cardiac Electrophysiology Procedures

Published on: April 21, 2013

27.9K
Non-fluoroscopic Catheter Tracking for Fluoroscopy Reduction in Interventional Electrophysiology
10:46

Non-fluoroscopic Catheter Tracking for Fluoroscopy Reduction in Interventional Electrophysiology

Published on: May 26, 2015

13.3K
Benefits of Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy in an Asynchronous Heart Failure Model Induced by Left Bundle Branch Ablation and Rapid Pacing
12:45

Benefits of Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy in an Asynchronous Heart Failure Model Induced by Left Bundle Branch Ablation and Rapid Pacing

Published on: December 11, 2017

10.5K

Area of Science:

  • Medical Physics
  • Interventional Cardiology
  • Occupational Health

Background:

  • Percutaneous transcatheter interventions pose significant radiation exposure risks.
  • Proceduralists and staff in cardiac catheterization labs (CCL) face health risks from radiation and heavy personal protective equipment.
  • Current protective measures have limitations, necessitating innovative solutions.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To review novel radiation shielding technologies.
  • To discuss methods for reducing radiation exposure in the CCL.
  • To explore strategies for mitigating associated health and orthopedic risks.

Main Methods:

  • Literature review of existing and emerging radiation protection devices.
  • Analysis of current practices and their effectiveness.
  • Evaluation of innovative approaches for radiation dose reduction.

Main Results:

  • A variety of radiation shielding devices are available, each with pros and cons.
  • Some technologies are ready for widespread adoption, while others are still under development.
  • Innovative solutions aim to create a "lead apron-free" environment, reducing both radiation and orthopedic strain.

Conclusions:

  • Emerging technologies offer promising advancements in radiation safety for CCL staff.
  • A multi-faceted approach combining shielding and ergonomic solutions is key.
  • The goal is to ensure a safer daily working environment, minimizing long-term health consequences.