Risk factors for nonidiopathic and idiopathic facial nerve palsies: findings of a retrospective study
Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 19, 2025
Facial Nerve Surgery in the Rat Model to Study Axonal Inhibition and Regeneration
Published on: May 5, 2020
Milena Kirchgässner1, Samuel Böhm-Gonzalez1, Johannes von Fraunberg2
1Department of Epileptology, Hertie-Institute for Clinical Brain Research, University of Tübingen, Otfried-Müller-Str.47, 72076, Tübingen, Germany.
Background:
Idiopathic (IF) and nonidiopathic facial (NIF) nerve palsies are the most common forms of peripheral facial nerve palsies. Various risk factors for IF palsies, such as weather, have been explored, but such associations are sparse for NIF palsies, and it remains unclear whether certain diagnostic procedures, such as contrast agent-enhanced cerebral magnetic resonance imaging (cMRI), are helpful in the differential diagnosis of NIF vs. IF.
Methods:
In this retrospective, monocentric study over a five-year period, the medical reports of 343 patients with peripheral facial nerve palsy were analysed based on aetiology, sociodemographic factors, cardiovascular risk factors, consultation time, diagnostic procedures such as cMRI, and laboratory results. We also investigated whether weather conditions and German Google Trends data were associated with the occurrence of NIF. To assess the importance of doctors' clinical opinions, the documented anamneses and clinical examination reports were presented and rated in a blinded fashion by five neurology residents to assess the likelihood of NIF.
Results:
A total of 254 patients (74%) had IF, and 89 patients (26%) had NIF. The most common aetiology among the NIF patients was the varicella zoster virus (VZV, 45%). Among the factors analysed, efflorescence (odds ratio (OR) 17.3) and rater agreement (OR 5.3) had the highest associations with NIF. The day of consultation (Friday, OR 3.6) and the cMRI findings of contrast enhancement of the facial nerve (OR 2.3) were also risk factors associated with NIF. In contrast, the local weather, Google Trends data, and cardiovascular risk factors were not associated with NIF.
Conclusion:
The findings of this retrospective study highlight the importance of patient history and careful inspections to identify skin lesions for the differential diagnosis of acute facial nerve palsy. Special caution is advised for hospital physicians during the tick season, as a surge in NIF cases can lead to a concomitant increase in IF cases, making it challenging to choose adequate diagnostic methods.
