Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 18, 2025

Coherent anti-Stokes Raman Scattering CARS Microscopy Visualizes Pharmaceutical Tablets During Dissolution
Published on: July 4, 2014
Optimizing carry-over in automated dissolution system dissoBOT for paracetamol and diclofenac sodium analysis
David Majer1, Aljaž Šporin2, Matjaž Finšgar1
1University of Maribor, Faculty of Chemistry and Chemical Engineering, Smetanova ulica 17, 2000, Maribor, Slovenia.
None:
In this work, an automated dissolution system (dissoBOT) was used for dissolution testing for the first time. Carry-over (CO) of the dissoBOT was determined for paracetamol (PA) and diclofenac sodium (DS), which are active pharmaceutical ingredients (APIs). Initially, partial method validation of the UV-VIS spectrophotometry method for PA and DS determination was performed by defining the limit of detection (LOD), the limit of quantification (LOQ), linear concentration range, accuracy, and precision. The LODs and LOQs were less than 0.01 mg/L for both APIs. The determined linear concentration ranges were from 1.00 mg/L to 30.00 mg/L for PA and from 0.50 mg/L to 3.50 mg/L for DS (the square of the correlation coefficient was greater than 0.9990, and the quality coefficient was less than 1.00 % for both APIs). The accuracy of the method was evaluated by calculating the recovery (Re) of the solutions of standards with known concentrations. The method for both APIs was deemed to be accurate (the average Re for PA and DS were 99.81 % and 101.43 %, respectively). Precision was evaluated by calculating the relative standard deviation (RSD). The method for PA and DS was deemed to be precise, as the RSD value for PA was 0.13 %, and for DS was 0.38 %. The volume (V) of the washing medium in both cleaning cycles performed by the dissoBOT system, as well as the medium dispensing V, were established, where the medium dispensing V was in accordance with the United States Pharmacopeia requirements. The CO of the dissoBOT system, using tap water as the washing medium, was determined to be less than 1.00 % for both APIs. The CO values for one cleaning cycle of the sampling station with a V of 2 mL was in the range of 1.24-1.54 %, for V of 5 mL was in the range of 0.78-0.93 %, and for V of 10 mL was in the range of 0.27-0.36 %. In addition, the CO of the dissoBOT, when employing two cleaning cycles of the sampling station (each V of 10 mL) was reduced (CO <0.20 %). Finally, the dissoBOT was successfully employed for the dissolution PA and DS tables.
More Related Videos
07:00Failure of Cleaning Verification in Pharmaceutical Industry Due to Uncleanliness of Stainless Steel Surface
Published on: August 11, 2017
09:16Author Spotlight: Optimization of Processing Technology for Tiebangchui with Zanba Based on CRITIC Combined with Box-Behnken Response Surface Method
Published on: May 12, 2023
Related Concept Videos
Factors Affecting Dissolution: Polymorphism, Amorphism and Pseudopolymorphism
Some polymorphic crystals possess lower aqueous solubility than their amorphous counterparts, leading to incomplete absorption. For instance, the oral suspension of Chloramphenicol, which...
Factors Influencing Drug Absorption: Pharmaceutical Parameters
Factors Influencing Drug Absorption: Drug Dissolution
Factors Affecting Dissolution: Drug Permeability, Stability and Stereochemistry
Factors Affecting Dissolution: Particle Size and Effective Surface Area
Washing, Drying, and Ignition of Precipitates