Symmetric versus asymmetric surgery for the treatment of intermittent exotropia with equal dominance

Long-term surgical outcomes were compared between bilateral lateral rectus recession (BLR) and unilateral lateral rectus recession combined with medial rectus resection in the same eye (R&R) for therapy of basic type intermittent exotropia (IXT) with equal dominance.

Two hundred and sixty-eight subjects (3-11 years old) with basic IXT with equal dominance who underwent BLR or R&R surgery were enrolled to this study, and with a minimum follow-up period of 18 months. One hundred and fourteen patients underwent BLR surgery and 144 underwent R&R surgery at a single centre. Surgical outcomes between groups were compared. Surgery results were divided into 3 categories: undercorrection/recurrence (exotropia/phoriaå 10PD), success(esotropia/phoria ≤5PD to exotropia/phoria≤10PD), and overcorrection (esotropia/phoriaå 5 PD) according to postoperative deviation angle.

No statistical difference was detected between BLR group and R&R group at all intervals with the exception of the last examination, demonstrating a higher success rate and a lower recurrence rate in the BLR group than R&R group at last visit (P = 0.04). Additionally, the BLR group demonstrated a smaller exodrift than the R&R group at distance and near fixation (P = 0.01; P = 0.03). Stereoacuity and exotropia control showed overall improvement following both surgeries, and this improvement had no statistical difference between groups(P > 0.05).

BLR showed better long-term results than R&R in the treatment of basic type intermittent exotropia with equal dominance given its low recurrence rate. Both BLR and R&R surgeries could improve stereoacuity function and exotropia control, and to same extents.