Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 6, 2026

Implantation of the Syncardia Total Artificial Heart
Published on: July 18, 2014
Impact of Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy on Ventricular Arrhythmias and Survival After Durable Left Ventricular
Connor P Oates1,2, Luke L Lawrence1,2, Grace E Bigham1,2
1From the MedStar Heart and Vascular Institute, MedStar Washington Hospital Center, Washington, District of Columbia.
Insights
Turning "on" cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) after left ventricular assist device (LVAD) implantation increased mortality risk. Further trials are needed to optimize CRT programming for LVAD patients.
Area of Science:
- Cardiology
- Medical Devices
- Heart Failure Management
Background:
- Cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) impact post-left ventricular assist device (LVAD) implantation is unclear.
- No consensus exists on optimal postoperative CRT management in LVAD patients.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate the effect of postoperative CRT management on clinical outcomes after LVAD implantation.
- To determine if CRT programmed 'on' or 'off' impacts patient survival and ventricular arrhythmias.
Main Methods:
- Retrospective analysis of 789 patients undergoing LVAD implantation (2007-2022).
- Comparison of outcomes between patients with preoperative CRT programmed 'on' versus 'off' post-LVAD.
- Analysis included mortality risk and incidence of ventricular arrhythmias.
Main Results:
- Patients with preoperative CRT programmed 'on' post-LVAD had significantly increased mortality risk (sdHR=1.54; p=0.036).
- No significant difference in ventricular arrhythmia incidence between postoperative CRT 'on' and 'off' groups (p=0.095).
- Preoperative CRT patients were older and more likely to receive LVAD for destination therapy.
Conclusions:
- Postoperative CRT programming 'on' is associated with increased mortality in LVAD patients.
- Further clinical trials are essential to establish optimal CRT programming strategies for LVAD recipients.
Abstract:
The impact of cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) in patients receiving durable left ventricular assist device (LVAD) implantation remains unclear and there is no consensus regarding postoperative management. We sought to determine the impact of postoperative management of CRT on clinical outcomes following LVAD implantation. A total of 789 patients underwent LVAD implantation at our institution from 2007 to 2022 including 195 patients (24.7%) with preoperative CRT. Patients with preoperative CRT were significantly older and more frequently received an LVAD as destination therapy compared to patients without preoperative CRT. After LVAD implantation, 85 patients had CRT programmed "off" and 74 patients had CRT programmed "on." The risk of mortality was significantly increased amongst patients with preoperative CRT that was turned "on" following LVAD implantation compared to patients with preoperative CRT turned "off" following implant (subdistribution hazard ratio [sdHR] = 1.54; 1.06-2.37 95% confidence interval [CI]; p = 0.036). There was no significant difference between incidence of ventricular arrhythmias in patients with and without postoperative CRT "on" (35.1% vs . 48.2%; p = 0.095). Additional clinical trials are warranted to determine the best CRT programming strategy following LVAD implantation.
More Related Videos
12:45Benefits of Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy in an Asynchronous Heart Failure Model Induced by Left Bundle Branch Ablation and Rapid Pacing
Published on: December 11, 2017
10:17Real-Time Cardiac Mapping with a Noninvasive Imageless Electrocardiographic Imaging System
Published on: April 11, 2025
Related Concept Videos
Heart Failure Drugs: Inotropic Agents
Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation III: AED Use
Heart Failure VI: Adjunct Therapies
Cardiomyopathy II: Dilated Cardiomyopathy
Cardiomyopathy III: Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy
Cardiomyopathy V: Interprofessional Care