Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 3, 2026
3D Imaging of PDL Collagen Fibers during Orthodontic Tooth Movement in Mandibular Murine Model
Published on: April 15, 2021
How does orthodontic tooth movement influence the dental pulp? RNA-sequencing on human premolars
Zuodong Zhao1, Catia Attanasio2, Chen Zong1
1Department of Oral Health Sciences-Orthodontics, KU Leuven and Dentistry, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.
Objectives:
The objective of this study is to analyse the gene expression profile of the dental pulp (DP) of human premolars subjected to 7 and 28 days of orthodontic force (OF) in vivo by using RNA sequencing. The maxillary and mandibular DP were additionally compared.
Methods:
Healthy patients requiring orthodontic premolar extractions were randomly assigned to one of the three groups: control (CG) where no OF was applied, 7 and 28 days, where premolars were extracted either 7 or 28 days after the application of a 50-100 g OF. Total RNA was extracted from the DP and analysed via RNA-seq. Differentially expressed genes (DEGs) were identified using a false discovery rate and fold change threshold of <0.05 and ≥1.5, respectively. Functional analysis was performed.
Results:
After 7 days of OF, pulp reaction indicates immune response, hypoxia, DNA damage and epigenetic regulation. After 28 days, cell adhesion, migration, organization and tissue repair are evident. The maxillary and mandibular pulp tissues react differently to OF. The maxilla exhibits minimal alterations, mostly related to immune response at 7 days and tissue repair at 28 days, whereas the mandible shows mostly DNA damage and epigenetic regulation at 7 days and return to the original state at 28 days.
Conclusions:
This study demonstrates that the early reaction of the DP to OF is marked by immune response, hypoxia and DNA damage. In contrast, after 28 days, cell adhesion, migration, organization, tissue repair and dentine formation are observed. Maxillary and mandibular premolars react differently to OF: although the maxilla exhibits minimal alterations at both time points, the mandible mostly shows DNA damage, epigenetic regulation, and immune response at 7 days. These disparities could stem from different blood supplies or the lower maxillary bone density, potentially triggering faster biological changes. Our findings provide insights into the gene regulatory networks modulating DP response to OF.
Related Concept Videos
01:15Teeth
In the bud stage, the tooth germ (an aggregation of cells) starts to form in the developing jawbone. During the cap stage, the tooth germ differentiates into enamel organ, dental papilla, and dental sac, which will later develop into the tooth's enamel, dentin...
01:21Tooth Anatomy
The Crown, Neck, and Root
The visible part of the tooth is referred to as the crown. It's covered by enamel, the hardest substance in the human body. The crown is uniquely shaped for each type of tooth, allowing for different functions such as cutting, tearing, or...