Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Conserved Binding Sites01:49

Conserved Binding Sites

4.2K
Many proteins’ biological role depends on their interactions with their ligands, small molecules that bind to specific locations on the protein known as ligand-binding sites. Ligand-binding sites are often conserved among homologous proteins as these sites are critical for protein function.
Binding sites are often located in large pockets, and if their location on a protein’s surface is unknown, it can be predicted using various approaches. The energetic method computationally...
4.2K
Protein Organization01:24

Protein Organization

6.3K
Proteins are polymers of amino acid residues. They are versatile and responsible for different cellular functions, including DNA replication, molecular transport, catalysis, and structural support. Proteins have a hierarchical structure comprising at least three levels of organization: primary, secondary, and tertiary structure. Some large proteins have a quaternary structure where individual protein subunits are linked together.
The primary structure of a protein is its amino acid sequence....
6.3K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Development of a Dual Chemical Probe for the USP16 and HDAC6 Zinc-Finger Ubiquitin-Binding Domain.

Journal of medicinal chemistry·2026
Same author

CACHE Challenge #3: Targeting the Nsp3 Macrodomain of SARS-CoV-2.

Journal of chemical information and modeling·2026
Same author

Enantioselective protein affinity selection mass spectrometry (E-ASMS).

Nature communications·2025
Same author

k-Nearest Neighbor Adaptive Sampling, a Simple Tool to Efficiently Explore Conformational Space.

Journal of chemical theory and computation·2025
Same author

CACHE Challenge #2: Targeting the RNA Site of the SARS-CoV-2 Helicase Nsp13.

Journal of chemical information and modeling·2025
Same author

Active Learning-Guided Hit Optimization for the Leucine-Rich Repeat Kinase 2 WDR Domain Based on In Silico Ligand-Binding Affinities.

Journal of chemical information and modeling·2025
Same journal

Mapping Evolution of Molecules across Biochemistry with Assembly Theory.

Journal of chemical information and modeling·2026
Same journal

Structural Proteomics-Based Deciphering of Hydrophobic Packing Fingerprints Informing Protein Thermostability in TIM Barrels.

Journal of chemical information and modeling·2026
Same journal

Bridging between Structure-Based and Data-Driven Affinity Prediction.

Journal of chemical information and modeling·2026
Same journal

Reinforcement Learning-Driven Multiproperty Optimization in Molecular Design Using Multicontext Transcriptome Data.

Journal of chemical information and modeling·2026
Same journal

EnsembleCycPerm: Interpretable Modeling of Cyclic Peptide Permeability through Solvent-Dependent Conformational Ensembles.

Journal of chemical information and modeling·2026
Same journal

Resolving Conformational Preferences of Monosaccharides from <sup>1</sup>H and <sup>13</sup>C NMR Chemical Shifts Using an Integrated MD and QM Approach.

Journal of chemical information and modeling·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jun 18, 2025

Author Spotlight: Evaluating Biophysical Assays for Characterizing PROTACS Ternary Complexes
07:22

Author Spotlight: Evaluating Biophysical Assays for Characterizing PROTACS Ternary Complexes

Published on: January 12, 2024

3.3K

Benchmarking Methods for PROTAC Ternary Complex Structure Prediction.

Evianne Rovers1,2, Matthieu Schapira1,2

  • 1Structural Genomics Consortium, Toronto M5G 1L7, Canada.

Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling
|August 1, 2024
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Computational tools for predicting Proteolysis targeting chimeras (PROTACs) ternary complexes show promise but require further development. Benchmarking reveals variability in predictions, suggesting PROTACs may adopt multiple configurations.

More Related Videos

A Protocol for Computer-Based Protein Structure and Function Prediction
16:41

A Protocol for Computer-Based Protein Structure and Function Prediction

Published on: November 3, 2011

68.6K
Protein WISDOM: A Workbench for In silico De novo Design of BioMolecules
10:58

Protein WISDOM: A Workbench for In silico De novo Design of BioMolecules

Published on: July 25, 2013

17.0K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jun 18, 2025

Author Spotlight: Evaluating Biophysical Assays for Characterizing PROTACS Ternary Complexes
07:22

Author Spotlight: Evaluating Biophysical Assays for Characterizing PROTACS Ternary Complexes

Published on: January 12, 2024

3.3K
A Protocol for Computer-Based Protein Structure and Function Prediction
16:41

A Protocol for Computer-Based Protein Structure and Function Prediction

Published on: November 3, 2011

68.6K
Protein WISDOM: A Workbench for In silico De novo Design of BioMolecules
10:58

Protein WISDOM: A Workbench for In silico De novo Design of BioMolecules

Published on: July 25, 2013

17.0K

Area of Science:

  • Computational chemistry and structural biology
  • Drug discovery and molecular design

Background:

  • Proteolysis targeting chimeras (PROTACs) are bifunctional molecules that induce target protein degradation via ubiquitination.
  • Accurate structural models of PROTAC ternary complexes are crucial for rational drug design and optimization.
  • In the absence of experimental structures, computational methods are employed to predict these ternary complexes.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To systematically benchmark the performance of three commonly used computational tools (PRosettaC, MOE, and ICM) for predicting PROTAC ternary complex structures.
  • To evaluate the accuracy and reliability of these tools in generating models that reflect experimentally observed structures.
  • To assess the conformational flexibility of PROTAC ternary complexes using molecular dynamics simulations.

Main Methods:

  • Systematic benchmarking of PRosettaC, MOE, and ICM using a defined dataset.
  • Generation of multiple ternary complex structures for each PROTAC.
  • Molecular dynamics (MD) simulations to explore conformational landscapes.

Main Results:

  • The evaluated computational tools generated diverse ternary complex structures, with some aligning with experimental data and others deviating significantly.
  • Molecular dynamics simulations indicated that PROTAC complexes can exist in multiple configurational states.
  • The study questions the sole reliance on experimentally observed structures as a definitive reference for computational predictions.

Conclusions:

  • Current computational tools for PROTAC ternary complex modeling offer valuable insights but face challenges in accuracy and conformational representation.
  • PROTAC complex structures may be more dynamic than typically represented by single experimental snapshots.
  • Future computational efforts should integrate structural and biophysical data, and the provided benchmarking dataset can aid in evaluating new tools.