Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 18, 2025

08:30
Maintaining Laboratory Cultures of Gryllus bimaculatus, a Versatile Orthopteran Model for Insect Agriculture and Invertebrate Physiology
Published on: June 8, 2022
3.2K
Competing adaptations maintain nonadaptive variation in a wild cricket population
Jack G Rayner1, Franca Eichenberger2, Jessica V A Bainbridge3
1Department of Biology, University of Maryland, College Park, MD 20740.
Summary
Adaptive cricket variants "curly-wing" and "flatwing" impede each other
Area of Science:
- Evolutionary biology
- Genetics
- Animal behavior
Background:
- Adaptive evolution in wild populations is driven by interactions between emerging variants.
- The Hawaiian field cricket (Teleogryllus oceanicus) provides a model for studying these interactions.
- Two distinct adaptive phenotypes, curly-wing and flatwing, have emerged in these populations, both conferring protection from parasitoid flies (Ormia ochracea).
Purpose of the Study:
- To investigate the genetic basis of the curly-wing and flatwing phenotypes.
- To understand the evolutionary dynamics of these co-occurring adaptive variants.
- To determine the impact of phenotype co-expression on adaptive fixation.
Main Methods:
- Crosses and genomic/mRNA sequencing to identify genetic underpinnings of curly-wing.
- Reanalysis of existing data for flatwing's X-linked inheritance.
- Population genetics simulations and field observations to model evolutionary trajectories.
Main Results:
- Curly-wing is associated with variation on a single autosome.
- Flatwing inheritance is confirmed as X-linked and single-locus.
- Fitness epistasis between curly-wing and flatwing prevents either phenotype from reaching fixation despite significant fitness benefits.
Conclusions:
- The co-occurrence of alternative adaptive phenotypes can inhibit their fixation in wild populations.
- Fitness epistasis is a significant factor limiting adaptive evolution in sexually reproducing organisms.
- Interactions between emerging adaptive variants may be a more common evolutionary force than previously recognized.
Related Concept Videos
Limits to Natural Selection
31.2K
Organisms that are well-adapted to their environment are more likely to survive and reproduce. However, natural selection does not lead to perfectly adapted organisms. Several factors constrain natural selection.
31.2K
Types of Selection
40.3K
Natural selection influences the frequencies of particular alleles and phenotypes within populations in several different ways. Primarily, natural selection can be directional, stabilizing, or disruptive. Directional selection favors one extreme trait and shifts the population towards that phenotype while selecting against individuals displaying alternate traits. Stabilizing selection favors an intermediate trait with a narrow range of variation. Deviation from the optimal phenotype towards an...
40.3K
What is Natural Selection?
115.0K
Natural selection is an evolutionary process in which individuals with survival-promoting traits reproduce at higher rates. These favorable traits become more common within a population or species. Naturally selected traits initially arise via random genetic mutations. In order for selection to occur, there must be variation within a population, the trait controlling the variation must be heritable, and there must be an evolutionary advantage for variation in the trait.
115.0K
Frequency-dependent Selection
21.9K
When the fitness of a trait is influenced by how common it is (i.e., its frequency) relative to different traits within a population, this is referred to as frequency-dependent selection. Frequency-dependent selection may occur between species or within a single species. This type of selection can either be positive—with more common phenotypes having higher fitness—or negative, with rarer phenotypes conferring increased fitness.
21.9K
Competition
21.5K
When organisms require the same limited resources within an environment, they may have to compete for them. Competition is a net-negative interaction. Even if two competing individuals or populations do not interact directly, the overall fitness of both competitors is lowered as a result of not having full access to the limited resource.
21.5K
Predator-Prey Interactions
16.2K
Predators consume prey for energy. Predators that acquire prey and prey that avoid predation both increase their chances of survival and reproduction (i.e., fitness). Routine predator-prey interactions elicit mutual adaptations that improve predator offenses, such as claws, teeth, and speed, as well as prey defenses, including crypsis, aposematism, and mimicry. Thus, predator-prey interactions resemble an evolutionary arms race.
16.2K

