Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Types of Biopharmaceutical Studies: Controlled and Non-Controlled Approaches01:23

Types of Biopharmaceutical Studies: Controlled and Non-Controlled Approaches

124
Biopharmaceutical studies constitute a vital field aiming to enhance drug delivery methods and refine therapeutic approaches, drawing upon diverse interdisciplinary knowledge. In research methodologies, the choice between controlled and non-controlled studies significantly influences the study's reliability and accuracy.
Non-controlled studies, commonly employed for initial exploration, lack a control group, rendering them susceptible to biases and external influences. In contrast,...
124
Criteria for Causality: Bradford Hill Criteria - II01:28

Criteria for Causality: Bradford Hill Criteria - II

259
The Bradford Hill criteria serve as guidelines for establishing causative links in epidemiological research. Beyond Strength, Consistency, Specificity, and Temporality, key criteria also include Biological Gradient, Plausibility, Coherence, Experiment, and Analogy. These principles assist scientists in assessing the likelihood of causation in complex biological contexts. Below is a summary of these concepts:
259
Cancer Survival Analysis01:21

Cancer Survival Analysis

334
Cancer survival analysis focuses on quantifying and interpreting the time from a key starting point, such as diagnosis or the initiation of treatment, to a specific endpoint, such as remission or death. This analysis provides critical insights into treatment effectiveness and factors that influence patient outcomes, helping to shape clinical decisions and guide prognostic evaluations. A cornerstone of oncology research, survival analysis tackles the challenges of skewed, non-normally...
334
Bias in Epidemiological Studies01:29

Bias in Epidemiological Studies

190
Biases can arise at various stages of research, from study design and data collection to analysis and interpretation. Recognizing and addressing these biases is essential to ensure the validity and reliability of epidemiological findings.Broadly speaking, biases in epidemiology fall into three main categories: selection bias, information bias, and confounding. A more detailed description of possible biases is:  
190
Statistical Methods for Analyzing Epidemiological Data01:25

Statistical Methods for Analyzing Epidemiological Data

337
Epidemiological data primarily involves information on specific populations' occurrence, distribution, and determinants of health and diseases. This data is crucial for understanding disease patterns and impacts, aiding public health decision-making and disease prevention strategies. The analysis of epidemiological data employs various statistical methods to interpret health-related data effectively. Here are some commonly used methods:
337
Comparing the Survival Analysis of Two or More Groups01:20

Comparing the Survival Analysis of Two or More Groups

166
Survival analysis is a cornerstone of medical research, used to evaluate the time until an event of interest occurs, such as death, disease recurrence, or recovery. Unlike standard statistical methods, survival analysis is particularly adept at handling censored data—instances where the event has not occurred for some participants by the end of the study or remains unobserved. To address these unique challenges, specialized techniques like the Kaplan-Meier estimator, log-rank test, and...
166

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

From Readers to Leaders: A Call to Action for Breast Radiologists.

AJR. American journal of roentgenology·2026
Same author

Identifying Interventions to Reduce Breast Cancer Screening Barriers using Community Centered Prioritization Exercises.

Journal of breast imaging·2026
Same author

Geographic Analysis of Digital Breast Tomosynthesis Availability in High- and Low-Deprivation Areas.

Journal of the American College of Radiology : JACR·2026
Same author

Psychological safety in interdisciplinary teams: how leadership behaviors empower teams.

Frontiers in psychology·2026
Same author

"It's a Donut!" - Veterans' perspectives of lung cancer screening with low-dose computed tomography.

Patient education and counseling·2026
Same author

The Advantages and Disadvantages of Same-Day Breast Imaging Services: Clinical Review, Implications, and Future Directions.

Journal of breast imaging·2026
Same journal

Breast Cancer Risk and Screening in Active Duty Military Members and Veterans.

Journal of breast imaging·2026
Same journal

Correction to: Prevalence of Axillary Arch Variant Anatomy on Breast MRI and Impact on Axillary Lymph Node Assessment.

Journal of breast imaging·2026
Same journal

Breast Arterial Calcification on Mammography: Act Now Please.

Journal of breast imaging·2026
Same journal

Breast Arterial Calcification as a Predictor for Future Cardiovascular Events and Mortality: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

Journal of breast imaging·2026
Same journal

Imaging Features and Risk Factors Associated with Locoregional Recurrence of Breast Cancer: Insights for Imaging and Clinical Practice.

Journal of breast imaging·2026
Same journal

A Framework for Aligning 5-Year and Lifetime Breast Cancer Risk in Women Without High-Penetrance Mutations.

Journal of breast imaging·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jun 18, 2025

Comparison of Three Different Methods for Determining Cell Proliferation in Breast Cancer Cell Lines
12:35

Comparison of Three Different Methods for Determining Cell Proliferation in Breast Cancer Cell Lines

Published on: September 3, 2016

19.5K

Methodological Considerations in Evaluating Breast Cancer Screening Studies.

Anand K Narayan1, Randy C Miles2, Ryan W Woods1

  • 1University of Wisconsin-Madison School of Medicine and Public Health, Madison, WI, USA.

Journal of Breast Imaging
|August 3, 2024
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

High-quality evidence supports mammography screening for breast cancer. This review examines frameworks for evaluating screening tests to optimize benefits and minimize harms in evidence-based medicine.

Keywords:
breast neoplasmsearly detection of cancerepidemiologic methodsevidence-based medicinemass screening

More Related Videos

Performing Data Mining And Integrative Analysis Of Biomarker in Breast Cancer Using Multiple Publicly Accessible Databases
07:41

Performing Data Mining And Integrative Analysis Of Biomarker in Breast Cancer Using Multiple Publicly Accessible Databases

Published on: May 17, 2019

8.9K
Evaluating the Effectiveness of Cancer Drug Sensitization In Vitro and In Vivo
09:19

Evaluating the Effectiveness of Cancer Drug Sensitization In Vitro and In Vivo

Published on: February 6, 2015

8.7K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jun 18, 2025

Comparison of Three Different Methods for Determining Cell Proliferation in Breast Cancer Cell Lines
12:35

Comparison of Three Different Methods for Determining Cell Proliferation in Breast Cancer Cell Lines

Published on: September 3, 2016

19.5K
Performing Data Mining And Integrative Analysis Of Biomarker in Breast Cancer Using Multiple Publicly Accessible Databases
07:41

Performing Data Mining And Integrative Analysis Of Biomarker in Breast Cancer Using Multiple Publicly Accessible Databases

Published on: May 17, 2019

8.9K
Evaluating the Effectiveness of Cancer Drug Sensitization In Vitro and In Vivo
09:19

Evaluating the Effectiveness of Cancer Drug Sensitization In Vitro and In Vivo

Published on: February 6, 2015

8.7K

Area of Science:

  • Evidence-based medicine
  • Health services research
  • Medical screening

Background:

  • Meta-analyses confirm mammography screening reduces breast cancer mortality.
  • Major U.S. guidelines recommend screening mammography for average-risk women, though age and frequency remain debated.
  • Observational studies and modeling can fill evidence gaps for contemporary screening practices.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To review methodological considerations for evaluating screening tests.
  • To discuss analytic frameworks used by policymakers and researchers.
  • To support evidence-based screening test development, dissemination, and implementation.

Main Methods:

  • Review of established principles for evaluating screening tests.
  • Analysis of frameworks like Wilson and Jungner principles and the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force (USPSTF) model.
  • Focus on key evaluation criteria: public health significance, disease natural history, cost-effectiveness, and test/treatment characteristics.

Main Results:

  • Structured evaluation frameworks exist for assessing screening test effectiveness.
  • Key considerations include disease burden, natural history, economic factors, and test performance.
  • Rigorous evaluation aims to maximize screening benefits while minimizing potential harms.

Conclusions:

  • Breast imaging radiologists need to understand evaluation frameworks for new screening technologies.
  • Analytic frameworks provide a structured approach to evidence-based screening recommendations.
  • Systematic evaluation ensures screening tests are effective and safe for public health.