Search research articles

ABOUT JoVE

Overview Leadership Blog JoVE Help Center

AUTHORS

Publishing Process Editorial Board Scope & Policies Peer Review FAQ Submit

LIBRARIANS

Testimonials Subscriptions Access Resources Library Advisory Board FAQ

RESEARCH

JoVE Journal Methods Collections JoVE Encyclopedia of Experiments Archive

EDUCATION

JoVE Core JoVE Business JoVE Science Education JoVE Lab Manual Faculty Resource Center Faculty Site

Terms & Conditions of Use

Related Concept Videos

Diversity in Cell Signaling Responses

Diversity in Cell Signaling Responses

The physiological function of a cell and cellular communication are outcomes of a range of extrinsic signals, intracellular signaling pathways, and cellular responses. No two cell types express the same repertoire of signaling components. Receptors are highly selective for their cognate ligands, but once activated, they can alter multiple cellular processes such as DNA transcription, protein synthesis, and metabolic activity.
Graded and Abrupt Responses
Some signaling systems generate...

Integration of Synaptic Events

Integration of Synaptic Events

Synaptic integration mainly includes the summation of graded potentials. Graded potentials, regardless of their type, cause subtle alterations in membrane voltage, resulting in either depolarization or hyperpolarization. These incremental changes, when combined or summed, can propel the neuron toward its threshold. Consider, for example, a membrane experiencing a +15 mV shift, causing it to depolarize from -70 mV to -55 mV. In this scenario, graded potentials govern the membrane's ability to...

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by

Same author

Using Steady-State Visual Evoked Potentials to Characterize Wide-Ranging Retinopathy Linked to <i>CRB1</i>: Implications for Clinical Trials.

Computational and structural biotechnology journal·2026

Same author

Beyond binding: lunch can be surprisingly affordable.

Trends in cognitive sciences·2026

Same author

Effects of Expectation, Attention, and NMDA Receptor Blockade on Feedforward and Feedback Processing.

The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience·2026

Same author

Beyond binding: specialization without segregation.

Trends in cognitive sciences·2025

Same author

Neural correlates of unconscious processing in functional magnetic resonance imaging: does brain activity contain more information than can be consciously reported?

Neuroscience of consciousness·2025

Same author

Reply: Lack of statistical significance is not evidence against modularity in visual feature processing.

Brain : a journal of neurology·2025

Same journal

Sensation without perception: The white whale effect and perceptual blindness in autonomous vehicles.

Journal of vision·2026

Same journal

Gaze behavior during closed-captioned movie viewing adapts to absent audio through more frequent switching between text and scene.

Journal of vision·2026

Same journal

In pursuit of saccade awareness: Limited volitional control and minimal conscious access to catch-up saccades during smooth pursuit eye movements.

Journal of vision·2026

Same journal

Dissociable effects of element-lifetime and stimulus-duration on local and global motion processing: An equivalent noise study.

Journal of vision·2026

Same journal

On manipulating motion gain in immersive virtual environments: An unidentified source of external noise and a new psychometric function.

Journal of vision·2026

Same journal

Visual information for the identification of nonrigid motion.

Journal of vision·2026

See all related articles

Search research articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jun 18, 2025

Testing Sensory and Multisensory Function in Children with Autism Spectrum Disorder

Testing Sensory and Multisensory Function in Children with Autism Spectrum Disorder

Published on: April 22, 2015

Feature binding is slow: Temporal integration explains apparent ultrafast binding.

Lucija Blaževski^1,2, Timo Stein^1,3, H Steven Scholte^1,4

¹Department of Psychology, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.

Journal of Vision

|August 5, 2024

Summary

This summary is machine-generated.

Feature binding in visual perception occurs slowly, challenging early binding theories. Our experiments show that integrating visual features like orientation and luminance requires substantial time, supporting late binding models.

More Related Videos

Temporal Ordering of Dynamic Expression Data from Detailed Spatial Expression Maps

Temporal Ordering of Dynamic Expression Data from Detailed Spatial Expression Maps

Published on: February 9, 2017

Measuring Attention and Visual Processing Speed by Model-based Analysis of Temporal-order Judgments

Measuring Attention and Visual Processing Speed by Model-based Analysis of Temporal-order Judgments

Published on: January 23, 2017

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jun 18, 2025

Testing Sensory and Multisensory Function in Children with Autism Spectrum Disorder

Testing Sensory and Multisensory Function in Children with Autism Spectrum Disorder

Published on: April 22, 2015

Temporal Ordering of Dynamic Expression Data from Detailed Spatial Expression Maps

Temporal Ordering of Dynamic Expression Data from Detailed Spatial Expression Maps

Published on: February 9, 2017

Measuring Attention and Visual Processing Speed by Model-based Analysis of Temporal-order Judgments

Measuring Attention and Visual Processing Speed by Model-based Analysis of Temporal-order Judgments

Published on: January 23, 2017

Area of Science:

Cognitive Psychology
Neuroscience
Visual Perception

Background:

Visual perception requires integrating distinct features into a cohesive whole.
Traditional theories suggest feature binding is a slow, recurrent process.
Previous research indicated ultrafast, early binding of features within the same object.

Purpose of the Study:

To investigate the temporal dynamics of feature binding in visual perception.
To differentiate between early and late binding theories using controlled stimulus presentation.
To determine if feature integration occurs rapidly or requires extended processing time.

Main Methods:

Conducted three experiments manipulating the number of stimulus presentation cycles.
Assessed the binding of orientation and luminance features under varying temporal conditions.
Compared results against predictions of early and late feature binding theories.

Main Results:

Findings indicate that task-relevant feature binding occurs slowly.
Successful feature integration improved with additional presentation cycles.
Results contradict the hypothesis of ultrafast, early feature binding.

Conclusions:

The study supports late binding theories of visual perception.
Feature integration for objects is not an instantaneous process.
Temporal integration over extended periods is crucial for binding.