Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 17, 2025

Bridging the Technology Divide in the COVID-19 Era: Using Virtual Outreach to Expose Middle and High School Students to Imaging Technology
Published on: September 28, 2022
Ivory tower in MD/PhD programmes: sticky floor, broken ladder and glass ceiling
Achint Lail1, Jeffrey Ding2, Brayden K Leyva3
1Faculty of Science, UBC, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.
Gender disparity persists in North American MD/PhD programs, with men holding significantly more faculty and leadership positions. Addressing this imbalance is crucial for academic medicine
Area of Science:
- Medical Education
- Gender Studies
- Academic Medicine
Background:
- Gender equity is vital for innovation and productivity in academic medicine.
- Understanding gender distribution in dual MD/PhD programs is essential for addressing disparities.
Purpose of the Study:
- To assess the gender distribution of faculty members in North American MD/PhD programs.
- To quantify career success metrics and leadership roles by gender.
Main Methods:
- Analysis of academic metrics including professorial ranks, leadership positions, publications, H-index, and citations.
- Statistical analysis (Chi-squared test) to determine the significance of gender distribution differences.
Main Results:
- Significant gender disparities were found across all faculty ranks (p<0.0001).
- Men held a disproportionately higher percentage of full professor (74.2%), associate professor (64%), assistant professor (59.4%), and lecturer (62.8%) positions.
- Men also dominated leadership roles, including department chairs (79.6%), vice chairs (69.1%), and program leads (69.4%) (p<0.001).
Conclusions:
- A prevalent gender disparity exists in North American MD/PhD programs, with women having lower professional standing.
- There is a clear need for initiatives to support women faculty for improved academic and professional advancement.
Related Concept Videos
Stereotype Threat and Self-fulfilling Prophecies
Cognitive Dissonance
Frustration and Conflict: Avoidance-Avoidance, Double-Approach Avoidance
Stereotypes, Prejudice, and Discrimination

