Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 17, 2025

Setup and Execution of the Rapid Cycle Deliberate Practice Death Notification Curriculum
Published on: August 5, 2020
CALMER Conflict: A Novel Curriculum for Graduating Medical Students to Manage and Defuse Patient-Provider Conflict
Jordan See1, Reed Van Deusen2, Rene Claxton2
1General Internal Medicine, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, PA, USA. Jordansee.tampa@gmail.com.
This study developed a de-escalation curriculum for medical students, significantly boosting their confidence in managing agitated patients. The program improved preparedness, though objective measures showed no difference compared to a control group.
Area of Science:
- Medical Education
- Healthcare Professional Training
- Patient Safety
Background:
- Workplace violence, including verbal aggression from patients, is prevalent among healthcare workers.
- Verbal de-escalation is a primary strategy for managing patient anger, yet undergraduate medical education lacks standardized curricula and evaluation methods.
- Existing training gaps necessitate the development of effective de-escalation skill programs for future physicians.
Purpose of the Study:
- To create and assess a medical school curriculum focused on de-escalation techniques for adult patients.
- To evaluate the curriculum's effectiveness using pre- and post-intervention surveys and an objective structured clinical examination (OSCE).
Main Methods:
- A novel curriculum, incorporating an interactive didactic based on the CALMER framework and a standardized patient practice session, was implemented in a "Get Ready for Residency Bootcamp."
- Forty-four fourth-year medical students participated in the curriculum, which emphasized six evidence-based de-escalation skills.
- Effectiveness was measured through post-curriculum surveys (82% response rate) and an OSCE.
Main Results:
- Surveys indicated a significant increase in student confidence in using verbal de-escalation skills, rising from 2.79 to 4.11 (p ≤ 0.001).
- Student preparedness improved across all de-escalation skills, with high curriculum satisfaction (average 4.79/5).
- The OSCE did not reveal significant differences in skill levels between students who completed the curriculum and those who did not.
Conclusions:
- The developed de-escalation curriculum is evidence-based, replicable, and effectively enhances medical student confidence and preparedness in managing agitated patients.
- While confidence and perceived preparedness increased, further refinement and objective assessment methods may be needed to demonstrate skill transfer in OSCE settings.
- This program offers a valuable model for integrating essential de-escalation training into undergraduate medical education to improve patient safety and healthcare worker well-being.
Related Concept Videos
Ethical Dilemmas II
Ethical Issues
Ethical Concerns in Healthcare:
Patient-centered Care
Nurses' Legal Responsibilities II
Communication between nurses and...
Nursing Ethical Principles II
Consider the following scenario, which illustrates how these principles are applied in the care of Mr. John, a fifty-year-old teacher diagnosed with metastatic liver cancer.
Initially, Mr. John's...
Nurses' Legal Responsibilities III
Cultivating a culture of collaboration and mutual respect among nurses transcends mere enhancement...

