Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 17, 2025

08:09
Vessel-sparing Excision and Primary Anastomosis
Published on: January 7, 2019
11.4K
Levator Ani Muscle Avulsion After Vaginal Delivery Comparing Routine Versus Restrictive Episiotomy: A Pilot Study
Teerayut Temtanakitpaisan1, Suvit Bunyavejchevin2, Pranom Buppasiri3
1Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Faculty of Medicine, Khon Kaen University, Khon Kaen, Thailand. teerte@kku.ac.th.
International Urogynecology Journal
|August 6, 2024
Summary
A pilot study found no difference in levator ani muscle avulsion rates between routine and restrictive episiotomy during vaginal birth. Pelvic floor outcomes were similar, suggesting restrictive episiotomy does not reduce levator ani avulsion.
Area of Science:
- Obstetrics and Gynecology
- Pelvic Floor Disorders
- Surgical Techniques
Background:
- Episiotomy is a common procedure during vaginal delivery.
- Levator ani muscle avulsion is a significant complication affecting pelvic floor function.
- The impact of routine versus restrictive episiotomy on levator ani avulsion requires further investigation.
Purpose of the Study:
- To compare the incidence of levator ani muscle avulsion following vaginal birth.
- To evaluate the effect of routine episiotomy versus restrictive episiotomy on levator ani avulsion.
- To assess pelvic floor ultrasound parameters in relation to episiotomy protocols.
Main Methods:
- A randomized controlled trial involving two cohorts of pregnant women.
- Prospective enrollment between September 2015 and December 2017 at a university hospital.
- Levator ani avulsion assessed via four-dimensional ultrasound screening.
Main Results:
- No significant difference in levator ani avulsion rates between routine (9.4%) and restrictive (10.3%) episiotomy groups.
- Anal sphincter tear rates were comparable: 12.5% (routine) vs. 13.8% (restrictive).
- No statistical differences observed in pelvic floor parameters like bladder neck descent or genital hiatus ballooning.
Conclusions:
- Restrictive episiotomy did not reduce the rate of levator ani avulsion compared to routine episiotomy in this pilot study.
- No significant differences in pelvic floor ultrasound parameters were found between the two episiotomy protocols.
- Further research is needed to confirm these findings in larger populations.

