Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 17, 2025

Characterize Disease-related Mutants of RAF Family Kinases by Using a Set of Practical and Feasible Methods
Published on: July 17, 2019
Comparison of Relative Activity versus Relative Expression Factors (RAF versus REF) in Predicting Glucuronidation
Sandhya Subash1, Deepak Ahire1, Mitesh Patel2
1Department of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Washington State University (WSU), Spokane, WA, 99202, USA.
Predicting glucuronidation requires understanding UDP-glucuronosyltransferase (UGT) enzyme activity. This study found recombinant UGTs (rUGTs) have poor and variable specific activity, impacting quantitative fraction of glucuronidation (fgluc) predictions.
Area of Science:
- Drug metabolism and pharmacokinetics
- Enzyme kinetics
- Biotechnology
Background:
- Predicting the quantitative fraction of glucuronidation (fgluc) by individual UDP-glucuronosyltransferase (UGT) enzymes is crucial for drug development.
- Challenges exist due to the lack of selective inhibitors and inconsistent activity of recombinant UGT systems (rUGTs).
Purpose of the Study:
- To compare relative expression factors (REF) versus relative activity factors (RAF) for predicting fgluc.
- To assess the utility of REF and RAF using rUGT data against human liver and intestinal microsomes (HLM and HIM).
Main Methods:
- REF scalars were derived from proteomics data for eleven UGT enzymes.
- RAF was calculated by measuring activities in rUGTs and microsomes with selective UGT probe substrates.
- Protein-normalized activity factor (pnAF) was generated by correcting UGT activity to protein abundance.
Main Results:
- REF values ranged from 0.02 to 1.75; RAF values ranged from 0.1 to 274.
- pnAF values were generally 5- to 80-fold, with exceptions for UGT2B4 (~180-fold) and UGT2B15 (>1000-fold).
- Differential specific activities of rUGTs confounded fgluc predictions.
Conclusions:
- Recombinant UGT enzyme activity is significantly lower than in microsomes at equivalent protein amounts.
- Poor and variable specific activity of rUGTs (per pmol protein) necessitates careful consideration in fgluc scaling.
Related Concept Videos
Phase II Reactions: Glucuronidation
Renal Drug Clearance: Comparison Between Renal Excretion Methods
Renal clearance is often associated with the renal glomerular filtration rate (GFR), which represents the rate at which plasma is filtered through the glomeruli in the kidney. When drug reabsorption is minimal and there is no active secretion, renal clearance is closely related to the...
Renal Clearance
Renal clearance refers to the volume of plasma cleared of a specific substance, such as creatinine, per unit of time. To measure clearance, urine samples are collected over a 24-hour period during each bladder voiding, followed by a single blood sample at the...
Drug Metabolism: Phase II Reactions
Factors Affecting Renal Clearance: Renal Impairment
One condition associated with renal failure is uremia. Uremia is characterized by impaired glomerular filtration and fluid accumulation in the body. This condition hinders the renal clearance of drugs, resulting in drug accumulation and potential...
Renal Drug Clearance: Overview
Renal clearance can be calculated using different methods. One approach is to divide the urinary drug excretion rate by the plasma drug concentration. This method directly measures renal clearance, indicating the kidneys' efficiency in...

