Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 17, 2025

A Machine Learning Approach to Design an Efficient Selective Screening of Mild Cognitive Impairment
Published on: January 11, 2020
Development of a diagnostic predictive model for determining child stunting in Malawi: a comparative analysis of
Jonathan Mkungudza1, Halima S Twabi2, Samuel O M Manda3
1Department of Mathematical Sciences, University of Malawi, Zomba, Malawi.
Insights
Childhood stunting prediction models were compared using various variable selection methods. The judgmental method identified key risk factors, yielding a model useful for early identification of at-risk children for nutritional interventions.
Area of Science:
- Nutrition Science
- Public Health
- Biostatistics
Background:
- Childhood stunting is a critical indicator of malnutrition and a global health priority.
- Predictive models for childhood stunting require careful selection of predictor variables for optimal performance.
- Understanding risk factors is essential for developing effective interventions.
Purpose of the Study:
- To compare the performance of diagnostic predictive models for childhood stunting.
- To evaluate different variable selection methods for identifying key stunting predictors.
- To develop a risk score for identifying children at high risk of stunting.
Main Methods:
- Literature review to identify stunting determinants in Sub-Saharan Africa.
- Multivariate logistic regression using Malawi Demographic Health Survey (MDHS 2015-16) data.
- Application of seven variable selection algorithms (backward, forward, stepwise, random forest, LASSO, judgmental) to identify predictors.
- Calculation of child stunting risk scores and assessment using AUROC, sensitivity, and specificity.
Main Results:
- 68 potential predictor variables were identified, with 27 available in the dataset.
- Commonly selected risk factors included household wealth, child's age, household size, birth type, and birth weight.
- The judgmental method yielded the best risk prediction model with an Area Under the Receiver Operator Curve (AUROC) of 64% in test data.
- AUROC was slightly higher for urban (67%) compared to rural (63%) children.
Conclusions:
- The developed child stunting diagnostic prediction model can serve as an initial screening tool.
- Early identification of at-risk children facilitates timely nutritional interventions.
- Variable selection methods significantly impact the performance of stunting prediction models.
Background:
Childhood stunting is a major indicator of child malnutrition and a focus area of Global Nutrition Targets for 2025 and Sustainable Development Goals. Risk factors for childhood stunting are well studied and well known and could be used in a risk prediction model for assessing whether a child is stunted or not. However, the selection of child stunting predictor variables is a critical step in the development and performance of any such prediction model. This paper compares the performance of child stunting diagnostic predictive models based on predictor variables selected using a set of variable selection methods.
Methods:
Firstly, we conducted a subjective review of the literature to identify determinants of child stunting in Sub-Saharan Africa. Secondly, a multivariate logistic regression model of child stunting was fitted using the identified predictors on stunting data among children aged 0-59 months in the Malawi Demographic Health Survey (MDHS 2015-16) data. Thirdly, several reduced multivariable logistic regression models were fitted depending on the predictor variables selected using seven variable selection algorithms, namely backward, forward, stepwise, random forest, Least Absolute Shrinkage and Selection Operator (LASSO), and judgmental. Lastly, for each reduced model, a diagnostic predictive model for the childhood stunting risk score, defined as the child propensity score based on derived coefficients, was calculated for each child. The prediction risk models were assessed using discrimination measures, including area under-receiver operator curve (AUROC), sensitivity and specificity.
Results:
The review identified 68 predictor variables of child stunting, of which 27 were available in the MDHS 2016-16 data. The common risk factors selected by all the variable selection models include household wealth index, age of the child, household size, type of birth (singleton/multiple births), and birth weight. The best cut-off point on the child stunting risk prediction model was 0.37 based on risk factors determined by the judgmental variable selection method. The model's accuracy was estimated with an AUROC value of 64% (95% CI: 60%-67%) in the test data. For children residing in urban areas, the corresponding AUROC was AUC = 67% (95% CI: 58-76%), as opposed to those in rural areas, AUC = 63% (95% CI: 59-67%).
Conclusion:
The derived child stunting diagnostic prediction model could be useful as a first screening tool to identify children more likely to be stunted. The identified children could then receive necessary nutritional interventions.
More Related Videos
Related Concept Videos
Survival Tree
Building a Survival Tree
Constructing a...
Multiple Regression
Farmers can use multiple regression to determine the crop yield based on more than one factor, such as water availability, fertilizer, soil properties, etc. Here, the crop yield is the response or dependent variable as it depends on the other independent variables. The analysis requires the construction of a scatter plot...
Mechanistic Models: Compartment Models in Algorithms for Numerical Problem Solving
In individual population analyses, different algorithms are employed, such as Cauchy's method, which uses a...
Mechanistic Models: Compartment Models in Individual and Population Analysis
Residuals and Least-Squares Property
If the observed data point lies above the line, the residual is positive, and the line underestimates the actual data value for y. If the observed data point lies below the line, the residual is negative, and the line overestimates the actual data value for y.
The process of fitting the best-fit...
Regression Toward the Mean

