Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Reliable Outcomes of Free Fasciocutaneous Flaps for Complex Oncologic Scalp Reconstruction: A Multicenter Comparative Analysis.

Journal of reconstructive microsurgery·2026
Same author

Defining response-adapted surgery after neoadjuvant systemic therapy in sinonasal squamous cell carcinoma.

Oral oncology·2026
Same author

Management of the Condyle in Posterior Mandibular Reconstruction: Major Clinical and Patient-Reported Outcomes.

Journal of surgical oncology·2026
Same author

The Fibula Free Flap for Salvage of Complications After Orthopedic Extremity Bony Fixation in Oncologic Patients.

Journal of surgical oncology·2025
Same author

The Proximal Fibula Bone Flap for Complex Maxillary Reconstruction: Anatomic Evaluation and a Case Report.

Microsurgery·2025
Same author

Reconstructing Segmental Mandibular Defects: A Single-Center, 21-Year Experience with 413 Fibula Free Flaps.

Plastic and reconstructive surgery·2025

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jun 17, 2025

A Postoperative Evaluation Guideline for Computer-Assisted Reconstruction of the Mandible
10:42

A Postoperative Evaluation Guideline for Computer-Assisted Reconstruction of the Mandible

Published on: January 28, 2020

6.5K

Computer-Assisted Surgery in Mandible Reconstruction.

Farooq Shahzad1

  • 1Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery Service, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York.

Seminars in Plastic Surgery
|August 9, 2024
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Computer-assisted surgery, utilizing computer-aided design and manufacturing (CAD/CAM), enhances head and neck reconstruction accuracy and efficiency. This technology offers significant benefits, particularly in complex delayed reconstructions, despite some limitations.

Keywords:
computer-aided designcomputer-aided manufacturingdental implants

More Related Videos

Designing CAD/CAM Surgical Guides for Maxillary Reconstruction Using an In-house Approach
08:01

Designing CAD/CAM Surgical Guides for Maxillary Reconstruction Using an In-house Approach

Published on: August 24, 2018

9.0K
3D Planning and Printing of Patient Specific Implants for Reconstruction of Bony Defects
08:15

3D Planning and Printing of Patient Specific Implants for Reconstruction of Bony Defects

Published on: August 4, 2020

6.4K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jun 17, 2025

A Postoperative Evaluation Guideline for Computer-Assisted Reconstruction of the Mandible
10:42

A Postoperative Evaluation Guideline for Computer-Assisted Reconstruction of the Mandible

Published on: January 28, 2020

6.5K
Designing CAD/CAM Surgical Guides for Maxillary Reconstruction Using an In-house Approach
08:01

Designing CAD/CAM Surgical Guides for Maxillary Reconstruction Using an In-house Approach

Published on: August 24, 2018

9.0K
3D Planning and Printing of Patient Specific Implants for Reconstruction of Bony Defects
08:15

3D Planning and Printing of Patient Specific Implants for Reconstruction of Bony Defects

Published on: August 4, 2020

6.4K

Area of Science:

  • Medical technology
  • Surgical innovation
  • Biomedical engineering

Background:

  • Osseous head and neck reconstruction presents challenges in accuracy and efficiency.
  • Conventional techniques can be limited by anatomical variations and tissue changes over time.
  • The need for precise surgical planning and execution is paramount in these complex cases.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To evaluate the impact of computer-assisted surgery (CAS) on osseous head and neck reconstruction.
  • To highlight the role of computer-aided design (CAD) and computer-aided manufacturing (CAM) in improving surgical outcomes.
  • To explore the specific advantages of CAS in delayed reconstruction scenarios.

Main Methods:

  • Utilizing computer-aided design (CAD) software for pre-operative planning of resection and reconstruction.
  • Employing computer-aided manufacturing (CAM) for creating patient-specific surgical guides and implants.
  • Comparing outcomes of CAS with conventional reconstruction techniques.

Main Results:

  • CAS techniques demonstrate superior accuracy in osseous head and neck reconstruction compared to conventional methods.
  • Reduced flap ischemia times were observed with CAS, indicating improved surgical efficiency.
  • CAS facilitates immediate dental implant placement and is particularly advantageous for delayed reconstructions.

Conclusions:

  • Computer-assisted surgery represents a significant advancement in head and neck reconstruction, offering enhanced precision and efficiency.
  • CAD/CAM technologies, including in-house solutions, are valuable tools for complex reconstructive procedures.
  • While cost and intraoperative flexibility are considerations, the benefits of CAS, especially in delayed cases, are substantial.