Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 17, 2025

08:29
Morphology Control for Fully Printable Organic–Inorganic Bulk-heterojunction Solar Cells Based on a Ti-alkoxide and Semiconducting Polymer
Published on: January 10, 2017
9.1K
Key factors behind the superior performance of polymer-based NFA blends
Elifnaz Sağlamkaya1, Mohammad Saeed Shadabroo1, Nurlan Tokmoldin1,2
1Institute of Physics and Astronomy, University of Potsdam, Karl-Liebknecht-Str. 24-25, 14476 Potsdam-Golm, Germany. shoai@uni-potsdam.de.
Materials Horizons
|August 9, 2024
Summary
All-small molecule solar cells offer advantages for organic photovoltaics commercialization. However, their efficiencies lag behind polymer-based systems due to lower charge carrier mobility and less ordered morphology, hindering performance.
Area of Science:
- Materials Science
- Organic Electronics
- Photovoltaics
Background:
- All-small molecule (ASM) solar cells present advantages like high solubility and simpler synthesis for organic photovoltaics (OPVs).
- ASM solar cells currently show lower efficiencies compared to polymer:small molecule blends.
- Understanding performance differences is crucial for advancing OPV commercialization.
Purpose of the Study:
- To compare an ASM blend (ZR1:Y6) with a polymer:small molecule blend (PM7:Y6) using the same non-fullerene acceptor (NFA).
- To investigate the factors limiting the efficiency of ASM solar cells.
- To elucidate the impact of morphology and charge generation on device performance.
Main Methods:
- Comparative analysis of ASM (ZR1:Y6) and polymer:small molecule (PM7:Y6) blends.
- Measurement of energetic offset between exciton singlet and charge transfer states (ΔEs).
- Evaluation of field-dependency of charge generation and charge carrier mobility using space charge limited current (SCLC) measurements.
- Morphological analysis using techniques like X-ray diffraction and microscopy (implied).
Main Results:
- Both ZR1:Y6 and PM7:Y6 exhibit similar energetic offsets (ΔEs).
- ZR1:Y6 displays a stronger field-dependency of charge generation compared to PM7:Y6.
- Lower charge carrier mobilities were observed in ZR1:Y6, attributed to suppressed charge dissociation.
- ZR1:Y6 morphology shows less crystallinity and more intermixing, hindering continuous electron transport pathways for the NFA.
Conclusions:
- The reduced efficiency in the ZR1:Y6 ASM blend is primarily due to lower charge carrier mobility.
- Morphological characteristics, specifically less ordered and more intermixed domains, impede efficient electron transport.
- Addressing morphological order and improving charge transport are key strategies for enhancing ASM solar cell performance.

