Glioblastoma Standard of Care: Effects on Tumor Evolution and Reverse Translation in Preclinical Models

Louis T Rodgers1, John L Villano2,3,4,5, Anika M S Hartz6,7

  • 1Department of Pharmaceutical Sciences, College of Pharmacy, University of Kentucky, Lexington, KY 40536, USA.

Cancers
|August 10, 2024
PubMed

Insights

Glioblastoma treatment needs improvement. Preclinical models should include therapies used in patients to better predict new glioblastoma (GBM) treatments.

Area of Science:

  • Neuro-oncology
  • Cancer Research
  • Translational Medicine

Background:

  • Glioblastoma (GBM) is the most common and deadliest adult malignant brain tumor.
  • Standard treatments (surgery, radiation, chemotherapy) have limited efficacy, leading to high mortality.
  • Current preclinical models often fail to predict clinical success due to lack of treatment exposure.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To review the impact of standard treatments on glioblastoma.
  • To highlight the limitations of current preclinical models in reflecting clinical recurrence.
  • To advocate for incorporating treatment-induced changes in preclinical GBM research.

Main Methods:

  • Literature review of glioblastoma treatment modalities.
  • Analysis of standard-of-care impact on tumor biology.
  • Summary of preclinical treatment strategies.

Main Results:

  • Standard treatments significantly alter GBM molecular profiles.
  • Recurrent GBM differs substantially from treatment-naïve tumors.
  • Existing preclinical models do not adequately represent treatment-induced GBM evolution.

Conclusions:

  • There is a critical need for advanced glioblastoma therapies.
  • Preclinical models must incorporate the effects of prior treatments.
  • Integrating treatment-experienced models will improve the translation of novel GBM strategies.