Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 17, 2025

08:43
Application of Granger Causality Analysis of the Directed Functional Connection in Alzheimer's Disease and Mild Cognitive Impairment
Published on: August 7, 2017
7.9K
A Comparative Study of Causality Detection Methods in Root Cause Diagnosis: From Industrial Processes to Brain
Sun Zhou1, He Cai1, Huazhen Chen2
1Department of Automation, Xiamen University, Xiamen 361102, China.
Sensors (Basel, Switzerland)
|August 10, 2024
Summary
This study compares 11 data-based causality detection methods for fault root cause analysis (RCA) in industrial and brain networks. Findings reveal practical insights and a potential interpretative pitfall for researchers and engineers.
Area of Science:
- Engineering
- Neuroscience
- Data Science
Background:
- Causal knowledge extraction from process measurements is crucial for fault root cause analysis (RCA).
- Existing causality detection methods often have idiosyncratic implementations, limiting accessibility.
- A unified comparison framework is needed for diverse research communities.
Purpose of the Study:
- To provide a comprehensive comparison of data-based causality detection methods for root cause diagnosis.
- To evaluate 11 distinct methods across two complex domains: industrial processes and human brain networks.
- To offer insights and a taxonomy for selecting appropriate causality detection techniques.
Main Methods:
- A unified evaluation framework was designed to compare 11 causality detection methods.
- Methods were implemented in a standard way to infer causal interactions from multi-variable signals.
- Experiments were conducted on plant-wide oscillations in an industrial process and epileptogenic focus localization in brain networks.
Main Results:
- The study presents a cross-domain investigation comparing the performance of 11 causality detection methods.
- Findings offer practical insights into the application and effectiveness of different techniques.
- An interpretative pitfall common to causality detection methods is identified and discussed.
Conclusions:
- Data-based causality detection methods can be effectively applied to complex systems like industrial plants and brain networks.
- The comprehensive comparison provides valuable guidance for researchers and engineers in RCA.
- Awareness of potential interpretative pitfalls is essential for accurate causal inference.
Related Concept Videos
Criteria for Causality: Bradford Hill Criteria - II
259
The Bradford Hill criteria serve as guidelines for establishing causative links in epidemiological research. Beyond Strength, Consistency, Specificity, and Temporality, key criteria also include Biological Gradient, Plausibility, Coherence, Experiment, and Analogy. These principles assist scientists in assessing the likelihood of causation in complex biological contexts. Below is a summary of these concepts:
259
Causality in Epidemiology
354
Causality or causation is a fundamental concept in epidemiology, vital for understanding the relationships between various factors and health outcomes. Despite its importance, there's no single, universally accepted definition of causality within the discipline. Drawing from a systematic review, causality in epidemiology encompasses several definitions, including production, necessary and sufficient, sufficient-component, counterfactual, and probabilistic models. Each has its strengths and...
354
Criteria for Causality: Bradford Hill Criteria - I
245
The Bradford Hill criteria are a group of principles that provide a framework to determine a causal relationship between a specific factor and a disease. There are nine criteria that are pivotal in assessing causality in epidemiological studies. Here's a closer look at Strength, Consistency, Specificity, and Temporality criteria with definitions and examples:
245

