Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 17, 2025

Highlighting and Reducing the Impact of Negative Aging Stereotypes During Older Adults' Cognitive Testing
Published on: January 24, 2020
The bias and precision of reporting the average age of human participants
1Department of Human Movement Sciences, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, van der Boechorststraat 9, NL-1081 BT Amsterdam, the Netherlands..
Abstract:
Most research papers in psychology study the behaviour of a sample of participants. To characterise this sample, authors report various characteristics, frequently including the mean age and the associated standard deviation. However, based on reports from authors who publish in Acta Psychologica and from respondents on X/Twitter, the present paper shows that some authors use rounded-down ages whereas others don't, which lead to an uncertainty of 0.5 year in the average age. The results furthermore show that the authors tend to report the average age with two decimals precision, irrespective of the uncertainty of this average. I recommend that publications should explicitly mention how the average age is determined and report its value using a number of decimals that reflects its uncertainty.
Related Concept Videos
Stereotypes, Prejudice, and Discrimination
Regression Toward the Mean
Bias
In statistics, a sampling bias is created when a sample is collected from a population, and some members of the population are not as likely to be chosen as others (remember, each member...
Longitudinal Research
Bias in Epidemiological Studies
Ethics in Research

