Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 17, 2025

Application of Ultrasound and Shear Wave Elastography Imaging in a Rat Model of NAFLD/NASH
Published on: April 20, 2021
A Real-World Experience Utilizing the FAST Score to Identify Patients With Nonalcoholic Steatohepatitis Fibrosis
Gres Karim1, Dewan Giri1, Brooke Wyatt2
1Department of Medicine, Mount Sinai Beth Israel Medical Center, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, New York.
Background And Aims:
We aimed to test the performance of the Fibroscan-aspartate aminotransferase (FAST) score, a noninvasive test, to identify nonalcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH) and significant fibrosis (NASH + ≥F2) in a cohort of patients with a histological diagnosis of NASH, using a cutoff of ≥0.35 as a rule in factor. We also compared performance to liver stiffness measurement (LSM) ≥8 kPa and the fibrosis-4 index (FIB-4) ≥1.3 and attempted to identify risk factors to develop a model for improving diagnostic accuracy.
Methods:
Patients with histologically confirmed NASH were identified from 2020-2021. Demographic information, laboratory data, and LSM were collected. The FAST score and FIB-4 were calculated. Univariate and backward entry multivariate logistic regression analyses were performed to identify risk factors in addition to the FAST score ≥0.35 that are associated with an accurate histological diagnosis of NASH + ≥F2. Discrimination and overall accuracy were assessed using area under receiver operating characteristic curves.
Results:
Using a rule in cutoff of ≥0.35, the FAST score performed with a sensitivity, specificity, negative predictive value, and positive predictive value of 96.4%, 36.8%, 77.7%, and 81.8%, respectively. Age (P = .05) and FAST ≥0.35 (P = .001) correctly identified histologically confirmed NASH + ≥F2. The FAST + age model outperformed FAST ≥0.35 (0.70, confidence interval [CI]: 0.55-0.84), LSM ≥8 kPa (0.72, CI: 0.59-0.85), and FIB-4 ≥1.3 (0.73, CI: 0.59-0.87) with a c-statistic of 0.78 (CI: 0.64-0.92).
Conclusion:
A FAST score with a rule cutoff of ≥0.35 performed well (c-statistic: 0.70) and was superior to LSM and FIB-4 when age was incorporated into the model (0.78) in detecting NASH + ≥F2 fibrosis in the real world.

